The Gay Thread

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

vg6kNyrlUxo

[wufongtan.]

This thread is gay

[wufongtan.]

most homophobic males are usually overcompensating for their own shakey sexuality.

I think that is the most over used argument against people who don't like homosexuality.It's a baseless argument. I don;t like tomato's. Does that mean deep down, i'm scared i'm a tomato? Or are you saying that all "homophobes" are gay? If so, there no one should be convicted of hate crimes against gays. As it's a gay on gay crime.

[wufongtan.]

The thing that annoys me is that racists, sexists and homophobics choose to be those things. A persons Race, sex or Sexuality isn't their choice. I think discriminating someone for something they can't change is despicable, though .

Well here's a ponderment. If gays are hardwired to be gay. Then "homophobes" must also be hard wired to be homophobes. So., really.. Isn't your thinking that all homophobes are despicable. Is also a sign of discrimination? Something which you, yourself said is despicable.
oooooo the irony.

[ferretchucker]

Well here's a ponderment. If gays are hardwired to be gay. Then "homophobes" must also be hard wired to be homophobes. So., really.. Isn't your thinking that all homophobes are despicable. Is also a sign of discrimination? Something which you, yourself said is despicable.
oooooo the irony.

No, it isn't being prejudice which is wrong, it's voicing or acting on those prejudice. Whilst it could be argued that ACTING on one's homosexual urges is also a choice, it's a choice which doesn't hurt people physically (any more so than is necessary) or emotionally. I have no issue with people not agreeing with it or even outright finding it disgusting, but there's no reason you can't keep that to yourself when it's going to cause pain if you don't.

[Ferox13]

No, it isn't being prejudice which is wrong, it's voicing or acting on those prejudice. Whilst it could be argued that ACTING on one's homosexual urges is also a choice, it's a choice which doesn't hurt people physically (any more so than is necessary) or emotionally. I have no issue with people not agreeing with it or even outright finding it disgusting, but there's no reason you can't keep that to yourself when it's going to cause pain if you don't.

I think thats pretty well said..

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

I think thats pretty well said..

ditto.

..........

[fuglystick]

Well here's a ponderment. If gays are hardwired to be gay. Then "homophobes" must also be hard wired to be homophobes. So., really.. Isn't your thinking that all homophobes are despicable. Is also a sign of discrimination? Something which you, yourself said is despicable.
oooooo the irony.

You're an idiot.

[ferretchucker]

I think thats pretty well said..

I...I got something right? I made a valid point?! This is a momentous occasion indeed. Let me get the balloons!:D

[wufongtan.]

No, it isn't being prejudice which is wrong, it's voicing or acting on those prejudice. Whilst it could be argued that ACTING on one's homosexual urges is also a choice, it's a choice which doesn't hurt people physically (any more so than is necessary) or emotionally. I have no issue with people not agreeing with it or even outright finding it disgusting, but there's no reason you can't keep that to yourself when it's going to cause pain if you don't.

I'm saying not it ok to abuse someone who is gay. Whether its physical or verbal. It's probably wrong. But... What is wrong with someone saying that they aren't going to give a gay a job, because he is gay? Or if two gays start kissing in front of them. And he says. Hey that's disgusting? Because as i said. If homosexuality is not a choice. Neither is homophobia. Because he is just acting in a way nature made him/her. The same way, homosexuals claim they are acting in a way that nature made them.

[wufongtan.]

You're an idiot.

Praise from Cesar.

[cheebacheeba]

I understand what he's saying to an extent...
I mean I've let it be known in here that I find certain elements or I dunno, would you call it "styles"? personas? of gay a little uncomfortable, and yes I can't say I'd really be thrilled to witness two guys making out...though in all honesty this pretty much applies to most prolonged PDA.
(Two girls making out, well...yeah I prefer porn without guys in it, so...bit biased)
I don't feel wrong at all in having these feelings, and I don't think anyone in their right mind could really lable me anti-gay.
Though do I think a person could do a better job because they're straight or gay?
Unless you're talking about certain jobs sexually, then no.
That's the line - that's taking it from feelings of "hm, this is different/awkward/weird" to "this is BAD because it's different/awkward/weird", then casting preconceptions on a persons worth or ability on account of their sexuality, going from personal opinion or feelings you experience, to something a little more malicious.
Experiencing feelings is one thing, acting upon them is another - this applies to many aspects of life...how many employers have you wanted to knock the shit out of, on account of their condescension, lack of ability, or abrasive demeanor?
How many members of the opposite sex do you see that you'd like to fuck? For me, it's many...but then, not acting on things like this is what keeps assault and sexual misconduct charges away from us.
You can discriminate and choose your company when it comes to your personal life, but the day you do so and it effects the lifestyle or infringes on the rights of another person, or their placement/ongoing employment within a workplace then you've crossed a line.

That said, again on the original point I'm not big on the whole PDA thing (again, unless it's two chicks)...but then, I'd rather just place myself elsewhere or look elsewhere than to even bother commenting...if it's happening on the ongoing IN a workplace, well regardless of sex/preference that's kind of inappropriate - I don't think there's a gay or straight person that could really disagree with that.

[ferretchucker]

I'm saying not it ok to abuse someone who is gay. Whether its physical or verbal. It's probably wrong. But... What is wrong with someone saying that they aren't going to give a gay a job, because he is gay?

Because that is discrimination based upon personal bias. If you feel that their sexuality may impair the person's ability to do the job, then I suppose it would be alright, however even that's a stretch. Lifestyle could play a fair part in it. I mean, if it was a type of person who was out all night with all sorts of promiscuous partners sharing needles blah blah blah then it's understandable that you wouldn't want them working for you. The thing is, all of those bad things could be done by a straight person.

The general difference is that you're DENYING somebody something for reasons which they cannot change. It's no different to not hiring somebody black simply because they're black.

Then again, I don't think I'd particularly want to work for a homophobic boss, so we'd be on the same page.

[cheebacheeba]

I think maybe the Tasmanian is trying to be controversial...

[gothjuice]

love always creates fear because love is death. death, death, death, the whore...

[fuglystick]

love always creates fear because love is death. death, death, death, the whore...

:rolleyes:

It's Night of the Living Cliche

[gothjuice]

:rolleyes:

It's Night of the Living Cliche

no one truly lives, we are far too busy dying... any differences between the living dead and the dying living are purely trivial. TRIVIAL...

[ferretchucker]

no one truly lives, we are far too busy dying... any differences between the living dead and the dying living are purely trivial. TRIVIAL...

That's so weird, I said the exact same thing this morning!

[wufongtan.]

Because that is discrimination based upon personal bias. If you feel that their sexuality may impair the person's ability to do the job, then I suppose it would be alright, however even that's a stretch. Lifestyle could play a fair part in it. I mean, if it was a type of person who was out all night with all sorts of promiscuous partners sharing needles blah blah blah then it's understandable that you wouldn't want them working for you. The thing is, all of those bad things could be done by a straight person.

The general difference is that you're DENYING somebody something for reasons which they cannot change. It's no different to not hiring somebody black simply because they're black.

Then again, I don't think I'd particularly want to work for a homophobic boss, so we'd be on the same page.

I agree. But. Because homophobia. Is a natural condition. Then a gay employer. Should not be able to deny employment to a homophobic. But i bet, if it went to court. The gay boss would win the court case. Which is discriminatory.

[wufongtan.]

I think maybe the Tasmanian is trying to be controversial...

Meh. I have never been to tasmania in my life. But anyway. I'm not trying to be anything. Just stating a ponderment. If ya all want threads which are just full of people patting each other in the back. I wont post here anymore. Not in hdc. just this thread.

[fuglystick]

I agree. But. Because homophobia. Is a natural condition. Then a gay employer. Should not be able to deny employment to a homophobic. But i bet, if it went to court. The gay boss would win the court case. Which is discriminatory.

Homophobia is not a "natural condition". Dope.

[Posher778]

Gay people are the devil

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

Gay people are the devil

finally, someone starts making some sense.

[wufongtan.]

Homophobia is not a "natural condition". Dope.

Yes it is. Just like homosexuality is "hardwired" into a gays brain. So is "homophobia" is hard wired into "homophobic brains. I know to some. It might seem frighting, to think that what many might deem a negative condition, as part of many humans natural make up. But it is the case.
And if people say that. Homophobia is part of human conditioning. So might one say that accepting homosexuality is also human conditioning. And it has nothing with acceptance at all. But rather, its all down to brain washing?

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

act right or ill punch you in the mouf

[Elvis_Christ]

act right or ill punch you in the mouf

Haha I read that as MUFF. Way funnier tbh.

[Posher778]

Yes it is. Just like homosexuality is "hardwired" into a gays brain. So is "homophobia" is hard wired into "homophobic brains. I know to some. It might seem frighting, to think that what many might deem a negative condition, as part of many humans natural make up. But it is the case.
And if people say that. Homophobia is part of human conditioning. So might one say that accepting homosexuality is also human conditioning. And it has nothing with acceptance at all. But rather, its all down to brain washing?

So you're gay?

[Elvis_Christ]

So you're gay?

You two would make a great couple.

[wufongtan.]

So you're gay?

You wish........

[Elvis_Christ]

You wish........

Nah YOU wish.

[fuglystick]

Yes it is. Just like homosexuality is "hardwired" into a gays brain. So is "homophobia" is hard wired into "homophobic brains. I know to some. It might seem frighting, to think that what many might deem a negative condition, as part of many humans natural make up. But it is the case.
And if people say that. Homophobia is part of human conditioning. So might one say that accepting homosexuality is also human conditioning. And it has nothing with acceptance at all. But rather, its all down to brain washing?

Come up with some proof.

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

I don't think posher would have sex with wufongtan, sorry wu

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

hatin gayz is natural, tolerance is learned.
humans are jerks

[wufongtan.]

Nah YOU wish.

You beg........

[wufongtan.]

Come up with some proof.

When you prove that homosexuality is natural.

[wufongtan.]

I don't think posher would have sex with wufongtan, sorry wu

My feelings of relief, outweighs any feelings of disappointment.

[ferretchucker]

I agree. But. Because homophobia. Is a natural condition. Then a gay employer. Should not be able to deny employment to a homophobic. But i bet, if it went to court. The gay boss would win the court case. Which is discriminatory.

The gay employer would have no reason to take the employee to court unless said employee was acting inappropriately in which case it would be a matter of abuse and not the employer disagreeing with the employees mindset. However, the employer could also refuse employment because the person's homophobia could impair their ability to work and receive orders from a gay boss.

[ferretchucker]

I actually think for once Wufongtan might be on to something. There could be people who have a natural fear of gays just as many are scared of spiders. There are phobias for almost anything. The thing is, going back to my previous point, acting on homosexuality doesn't affect anybody's human rights whereas acting on homophobia does. Equally, phobias can be dealt with far easier than the most basic instinct of attraction.

[fuglystick]

When you prove that homosexuality is natural.

The anterior hypothalamus of the brain participates in the regulation of male-typical sexual behavior. The volumes of four cell groups in this region [interstitial nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH) 1, 2, 3, and 4] were measured in postmortem tissue from three subject groups: women, men who were presumed to be heterosexual, and homosexual men. No differences were found between the groups in the volumes of INAH 1, 2, or 4. As has been reported previously, INAH 3 was more than twice as large in the heterosexual men as in the women. It was also, however, more than twice as large in the heterosexual men as in the homosexual men. This finding indicates that INAH is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;253/5023/1034

You want the full article, get it yourself.

Your turn. (Here's a hint: The closest you're going to come is proving homophobes are sociopaths. So, uh, congratulations on that?)

[ferretchucker]

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;253/5023/1034

You want the full article, get it yourself.

Your turn. (Here's a hint: The closest you're going to come is proving homophobes are sociopaths. So, uh, congratulations on that?)

Wow, I genuinely didn't know that. I knew it was biological somehow but didn't know to what degree.

[wufongtan.]

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;253/5023/1034

You want the full article, get it yourself.

Your turn. (Here's a hint: The closest you're going to come is proving homophobes are sociopaths. So, uh, congratulations on that?)

At best. biological research into sexual preference is muddled and inconclusive. And if it is to be relied upon. All it means is that homosexuality is caused by a chemical in balance in the brain. Much like depression. So if you're correct. Then people should stop calling them gays and start calling them sads. While it's a long bow to call. Homophobes sociopaths. Their "problem" (don't believe they have one.) Is more a hard wiring of the brain. Which really means. That Homophobes are indeed more natural than homosexuals.

[novadawn969]

How original. I didnt realize that trolls existed in Canada. You just try too hard to be "cool". Stop being a douche


:eek:
Oh my... I can't believe I just saw the word troll on HDC.
I thought we were better than that... ::tisk tisk::

I couldn't read on and not reply to that... :rolleyes:

You will realize, urdevel, that we are all trolls. I haven't been here in... forever and a day, and I still believe that.
We just kick ass like that. :D

[ferretchucker]

You know what, does it even fucking matter? I know that this isn't something I chose, because if it was then I would have made a lot of different choices when I was younger. It isn't something I could get away from and I really wanted to. And perhaps homophobes are natural too, but I don't see why they have to act on it. They don't gain any pleasure from it! It's just a "condition" based around anger and hate, and most of all a lack of tolerance. Homosexuality is a condition based around love and attraction. I think I know which is more natural of the two of them.

[fuglystick]

Whether homosexuality is a function of biology or personal choice shouldn't even be an issue; either way, it doesn't excuse a homophobic response. But I've always been amazed that homophobes believe that homosexuals would just voluntarily choose to join a persecuted and marginalized demographic. To what purpose? Just to piss off the homophobes?

[fuglystick]

At best. biological research into sexual preference is muddled and inconclusive. And if it is to be relied upon. All it means is that homosexuality is caused by a chemical in balance in the brain. Much like depression. So if you're correct. Then people should stop calling them gays and start calling them sads. While it's a long bow to call. Homophobes sociopaths. Their "problem" (don't believe they have one.) Is more a hard wiring of the brain. Which really means. That Homophobes are indeed more natural than homosexuals.

So first, you want to disregard the science, and second, you want to classify homosexuality as a disease. You insist that homophobia is a matter of "hard wiring" (without providing any evidence, as requested), but the evidence that homosexuality is biological you disregard out of hand. Tell me, do you have calluses on your knuckles from pacing around your cage on them?

Come back with some proof to back up your position, or don't bother coming back at all. I'm not going to waste time on someone who lets his ass speak for him.

[illdojo]

Well....I'm off to my Laboratory with 2 smokin' hot lesbo's to figure this whole "gay" thing out. I'll get back to you guy's. This could take some time and effort.

[wufongtan.]

But I've always been amazed that homophobes believe that homosexuals would just voluntarily choose to join a persecuted and marginalized demographic. To what purpose? Just to piss off the homophobes?
Yeah ok. Homosexuality. is the in thing. They are the most protected and praised members of the community. Look at how many African Americans died, because of race hate. Many thousands. One gay gets murdered. (it wasn't even because he was gay.) And they bring in tough hate crime laws.

[wufongtan.]

So first, you want to disregard the science, and second, you want to classify homosexuality as a disease. You insist that homophobia is a matter of "hard wiring" (without providing any evidence, as requested), but the evidence that homosexuality is biological you disregard out of hand. Tell me, do you have calluses on your knuckles from pacing around your cage on them?

Come back with some proof to back up your position, or don't bother coming back at all. I'm not going to waste time on someone who lets his ass speak for him.

I never " just" disregarded your Scientific" evidence. I just said what the main stream science community says. To find out why people are hard wired to be homophobes. Go research why people have green eyes or blond hair. It's the same principal.
One more thing. I find amusing about your post.
You use the NIMH epidemiological research as proof as homosexuality, being a natural occurrence. Then say. What i have described homophobes as sociopaths. Yet both homosexuals and sociopaths. Have high levels of NIMH .
Yet one section of society having these high levels is seen as proof that their condition is natural. And the other group. Well people speak of cures and treatments.

[fuglystick]

I never " just" disregarded your Scientific" evidence. I just said what the main stream science community says. To find out why people are hard wired to be homophobes. Go research why people have green eyes or blond hair. It's the same principal.
One more thing. I find amusing about your post.
You use the NIMH epidemiological research as proof as homosexuality, being a natural occurrence. Then say. What i have described homophobes as sociopaths. Yet both homosexuals and sociopaths. Have high levels of NIMH .
Yet one section of society having these high levels is seen as proof that their condition is natural. And the other group. Well people speak of cures and treatments.

You are not citing any evidence to support your position, and until you do, it's nothing but opinion. I'm done with you.

[ferretchucker]

I never " just" disregarded your Scientific" evidence. I just said what the main stream science community says. To find out why people are hard wired to be homophobes. Go research why people have green eyes or blond hair. It's the same principal.
One more thing. I find amusing about your post.
You use the NIMH epidemiological research as proof as homosexuality, being a natural occurrence. Then say. What i have described homophobes as sociopaths. Yet both homosexuals and sociopaths. Have high levels of NIMH .
Yet one section of society having these high levels is seen as proof that their condition is natural. And the other group. Well people speak of cures and treatments.

What I find amusing is that you're saying about how Homophobes are misunderstood and shouldn't be judged etc. because they can't change it. Can you spell irony?

And really, what kind of an argument is "more people should be persecuted and killed before society bans the prejudice of a group of people"? No doubt you'll argue my rewriting of your words but that is the jist of what you said.

And you must be truly ignorant to believe that someone would choose to be homosexual just to be popular. Do you know why? Because you can't choose to be homosexual. You can choose to perform the acts, you could have sex with a thousand of the same sex and still not be gay because it is in the MIND. It isn't the act which makes somebody homosexual, it's the inner thoughts. Why anybody would have sex with 1000 of the same sex and not enjoy it is beyond me, but I'm just using it for my point. Just like somebody could practice a christianity, but unless they truly believe in it, they're not real christians.

[ferretchucker]

Yeah ok. Homosexuality. is the in thing. They are the most protected and praised members of the community. Look at how many African Americans died, because of race hate. Many thousands. One gay gets murdered. (it wasn't even because he was gay.) And they bring in tough hate crime laws.

Just stupid. This entire post. You may have only heard of one gay person being murdered but that doesn't mean it's the only occasion. The laws were brought in because of common sense, compassion, understanding and respect. Tough hate crime laws? And are you suggesting by "tough" hate crime laws that they should be more lax? Perhaps you should be able to beat a gay person for their sexuality moderately. Have a broken bone limit. No prosecution if it's under 3.

As for the "most praised and protected" members of society. One, completely false. One of the reasons I've still not come out to many is because all throughout the day, from my friends and from my co-workers I often here both casual and aggressive slander of gays.

[wufongtan.]

What I find amusing is that you're saying about how Homophobes are misunderstood and shouldn't be judged etc. because they can't change it. Can you spell irony?

Of course i can. I stated this fact in my second post on this thread.

And really, what kind of an argument is "more people should be persecuted and killed before society bans the prejudice of a group of people"? No doubt you'll argue my rewriting of your words but that is the jist of what you said.

I never claimed that the race hate laws are a bad thing. I was answering your claim that gays are so down trodden and persecuted. They kill many thousand of African Americans because of race over many years. And no tough laws are brought in to stop this. They kill one person who happened to be gay. And tough new laws are brought in asap. That occurrence, shows that gays are not down trodden and persecuted.

[wufongtan.]

As for the "most praised and protected" members of society. One, completely false. One of the reasons I've still not come out to many is because all throughout the day, from my friends and from my co-workers I often here both casual and aggressive slander of gays.

I understand. It's one of the reason why i refuse to come out as a straight white male. Everytime i turn on the tv, i hear both casual and agressive slander of straight white males.

[fuglystick]

Poor Wu, persecuted homophobe :(

Shame on you, Ferret, for callously manipulating Wu's biological imperative to hate. I'm not sure, but he might have a civil rights case...

[ferretchucker]

Of course i can. I stated this fact in my second post on this thread.



I never claimed that the race hate laws are a bad thing. I was answering your claim that gays are so down trodden and persecuted. They kill many thousand of African Americans because of race over many years. And no tough laws are brought in to stop this. They kill one person who happened to be gay. And tough new laws are brought in asap. That occurrence, shows that gays are not down trodden and persecuted.

No, it shows that society has moved on and recognises that they need to take action to prevent a problem before it reaches the extremities of the black race prejudice. Doesn't mean that there aren't still countless people out there who would quite happily do the same as they did to the gays as the blacks. We may not perhaps be in as bad a situation as they were, and in some cases still are, but there is still a lot of hatred out there.

[ferretchucker]

I understand. It's one of the reason why i refuse to come out as a straight white male. Everytime i turn on the tv, i hear both casual and agressive slander of straight white males.

Trouble is, the slander isn't because of your sexuality or the colour of your skin. In your case it's probably about your biological need to hate. (Natural homophobia)

[wufongtan.]

Poor Wu, persecuted homophobe :(

Shame on you, Ferret, for callously manipulating Wu's biological imperative to hate. I'm not sure, but he might have a civil rights case...

I have never stated a view one way or another on the subject.
Putting unwarranted lables on people. Is just evidence, that you have run out of things to say, before you ran out of the energy to type.

[wufongtan.]

Trouble is, the slander isn't because of your sexuality or the colour of your skin. In your case it's probably about your biological need to hate. (Natural homophobia)

That's a narrow minded bias, dare i say hetrophobic thing to say.

[The Mothman]

check out what Ugandans thinks of homosexuality.
FJRJdr36v2E&

[wufongtan.]

check out what Ugandans thinks of homosexuality.
FJRJdr36v2E&

How dare they question, the great Barry Obama. The messiah of all things left winged

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

At best. biological research into sexual preference is muddled and inconclusive. And if it is to be relied upon. All it means is that homosexuality is caused by a chemical in balance in the brain. Much like depression. So if you're correct. Then people should stop calling them gays and start calling them sads. While it's a long bow to call. Homophobes sociopaths. Their "problem" (don't believe they have one.) Is more a hard wiring of the brain. Which really means. That Homophobes are indeed more natural than homosexuals.

you keep going back to this whole natural thing... it's also natural to pee whenever you have the urge regardless of where you are.

yes racism and homophobia are both perfectly natural, but uncivilized.

[ferretchucker]

That's a narrow minded bias, dare i say hetrophobic thing to say.

I fail to see how. I was criticising your homophobia, not your heterosexuality. I'm actually a homophobicphobic, something which will probably prove useful when evading lynch mobs. At least my phobia is founded.

[cheebacheeba]

I think that's a funny preconception/misconception a lot of straight guys have...that gay guys are all after them. It's like, not all chicks are after them surely?
I think that there is part of the problem a lot of people have with gays (gays...dunno if that sounds right, suppose it's a little nicer than fags but "gay people" sounds a bit wordy...what's your preferred term anyways ferret?) is where their own mind takes them?
...not saying it's anything to do with the conversation or those partaking in it here as in all honesty it seems like this convo's kind of biting its own tail right now...

[Posher778]

Really, really boring.

[cheebacheeba]

Really, really boring.

That's what HE said..
OH!

[ferretchucker]

I think that's a funny preconception/misconception a lot of straight guys have...that gay guys are all after them. It's like, not all chicks are after them surely?
I think that there is part of the problem a lot of people have with gays (gays...dunno if that sounds right, suppose it's a little nicer than fags but "gay people" sounds a bit wordy...what's your preferred term anyways ferret?) is where their own mind takes them?
...not saying it's anything to do with the conversation or those partaking in it here as in all honesty it seems like this convo's kind of biting its own tail right now...

Any from:

Gays
Gay people
Gay folk
Queers
Homos
Butt Bandits
Butt Pirates
Fudge Packers
Queerosexuals
Fags (or any variation of that)
Sodomite
Child of Satan
Semenmen
Mincer


I'll report back to you when I have a full list :D

[wufongtan.]

I fail to see how. I was criticising your homophobia, not your heterosexuality. I'm actually a homophobicphobic, something which will probably prove useful when evading lynch mobs. At least my phobia is founded.

Who is homophobic? When have i stated anywhere that i hate gays?

[ferretchucker]

Who is homophobic? When have i stated anywhere that i hate gays?

Hmm, I suppose you haven't. Then again, some things don't need to be said. What is your standpoint on the subject of homosexuality?

[Posher778]

I'm having trouble typing because my wrists won't stay straight.

[wufongtan.]

Hmm, I suppose you haven't. Then again, some things don't need to be said. What is your standpoint on the subject of homosexuality?

Well. I don't really have one. Sure if i see two men kissing on tv, i have to swallow back a little bit of vile. But as far as gays being gays. I don't really care. Two men getting it on behind closed doors isn't going to make my life any worse off. I think flaming queers are just retarded. I don't believe that just cause some dude gets his dick cut off and gets hormone injections, makes him a woman. And i also think all those news stories about "men" getting pregnant is a load of shit. It's a woman. Transgender is in my opinion, the only mental illness that is pandered to by society. If i went around telling everyone, i really, really believed i was Napoleon. They wouldn't let me rule France. I would be put in a mental institution. I don't really care if they allow gay unions. As long as they don't try and force the Church (Catholic) to perform any ceremonies. As some sections are trying to push.

[ferretchucker]

That's fair enough, I guess. And I do understand your arguments about homophobia, that it's something that might not be able to be helped and could be a natural occurrence.

[Posher778]

As the faggot that this thread was created about I demand less Q.Q and more stupid deluded happy posts.



Thanks.

[ferretchucker]

I LIKE MUSICALSSs! :D

[ChronoGrl]

Hey, anyone remember Tatu?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/d1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/1213568589582_f.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mGBaXPlri8&ob=av2e

[Doc Faustus]

I wasn't able to get into their stuff. Unfortunately, I can't listen to music with my penis.

[novakru]

Hey, anyone remember Tatu?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/d1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/1213568589582_f.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mGBaXPlri8&ob=av2e

nice legs:cool:

[ProfondoXxRosso]

I love cock.

[ChronoGrl]

I wasn't able to get into their stuff. Unfortunately, I can't listen to music with my penis.

I thought that their video for "All the Things She Said" was totally hot (hur hur)... And I put a couple of their songs on a workout mix a few years ago, which was totally fun.

I even bought their album. :o

Apparently I DO listen to music with my penis.


...

They have an awful cover of The Smiths' "How Soon Is Now" too...

[novakru]

Well, not gay, probably classified as bi before marriage and now, just celibate.
I like beauty though....female and male beauty is amazing-especially without the sexual connection to it. When you can look at people and just see them, really see them...wow.

But for you Chrono, my lovely...anytime baby, ANYTIME:)

[Elvis_Christ]

http://i39.tinypic.com/23m7tjd.jpg

[newb]

Well, not gay, probably classified as bi before marriage and now, just celibate.
I like beauty though....female and male beauty is amazing-especially without the sexual connection to it. When you can look at people and just see them, really see them...wow.

But for you Chrono, my lovely...anytime baby, ANYTIME:)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v259/rockinmule/1.gif

[ChronoGrl]

But for you Chrono, my lovely...anytime baby, ANYTIME:)

Ditto, my darling Nova. ;)

[ChronoGrl]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v259/rockinmule/1.gif

Is that just me, or does that look like a vagina with an eye poking out of it?

Just sayin'.

[gothjuice]

if I had a vagina it would look like that

[Elvis_Christ]

if I had a vagina it would look like that

No it wouldn't

[DeadKlown]

did you see where that gay zombie movie was the only movie banned from the independent film festival or something?...maybe this site is where i saw that idk

[ferretchucker]

Mmm. Festering reanimated corpse sodomy. Stuff of my dreams.

[cheebacheeba]

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhxAANHr2SWqiwm73dMFdggjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid =20090625043520AAIHvBp

It's pretty gay.

[Elvis_Christ]

^^ LOL

did you see where that gay zombie movie was the only movie banned from the independent film festival or something?...maybe this site is where i saw that idk

Yeh that was the Melbourne film festival I believe and a few others followed suit. I doubt it would've been banned if it was hetro...

[wufongtan.]

if I had a vagina it would look like that

I thought all emos had vaginas

[wufongtan.]

^^ LOL



Yeh that was the Melbourne film festival I believe and a few others followed suit. I doubt it would've been banned if it was hetro...

That's because Australia is a proud anti gay nation. Well except for sydney. Which is sort of a wild life reserve for homo's. Where they can run foot lose and fancy free.

[Sistinas666]

Its nearly fucking 2011 and we still debate about this shit? 591 replies and no solution? The state of man makes my heart sad.

[ferretchucker]

Its nearly fucking 2011 and we still debate about this shit? 591 replies and no solution? The state of man makes my heart sad.

Took people long enough to work out Slavery was a tad mean too. One day things will be sorted.

[Posher778]

Pomegranate Juice.

[ChronoGrl]

591 replies and no solution?

Were you expecting us to solve World Homophobia here at HDC?

[ferretchucker]

Were you expecting us to solve World Homophobia here at HDC?

We can even solve the problem of the missing package...s.

[ChronoGrl]

We can even solve the problem of the missing package...s.

Shhhhhhhh - Keep it to yourself, or Flayed might just close this thread. ;):cool:

[Posher778]

Cranberry Juice.

[ChronoGrl]

Problem peein'?

[ChronoGrl]

I am literally tearing up at my desk right now watching this.

ax96cghOnY4

It's a longer video, but it's worth it. It's an appeal to gay youths following a recent trend of teenage suicide. This man is amazing and I think his message should be passed on.

[DeadKlown]

some one shoulda given him a tissue

[massacre man]

Were you expecting us to solve World Homophobia here at HDC?

I was... That hasn't been done yet?

[ferretchucker]

Working on it...my only solution at the moment involves a gun and a map leading me to Sarah Palin's...

[Posher778]

Working on it...my only solution at the moment involves a gun and a map leading me to Sarah Palin's...

I like her.

[massacre man]

Working on it...my only solution at the moment involves a gun and a map leading me to Sarah Palin's...

Whatcha gonna do with those?

[ferretchucker]

Whatcha gonna do with those?

Rob a flower shop, then give Sarah Palin a bouquet and ask her to be a be nicer to gays. DUH! :p

[wufongtan.]

Working on it...my only solution at the moment involves a gun and a map leading me to Sarah Palin's...
Sarah palin is the ultimate woman. Smart, hot, likes hunting. A good money earner. She is the total package.

[massacre man]

Rob a flower shop, then give Sarah Palin a bouquet and ask her to be a be nicer to gays. DUH! :p

Sarah Palin says flowers are fags! (Her words, not mine.)