halloween 3 ... bad movie or just annoying because no michael?

[Ginger<3]

i haven't seen it so i'm wondering.

[The_Return]

Theres a thread about this one the first page of the Modern Horror section:rolleyes:

EDIT - Here's the link:

http://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25595

[Ginger<3]

not exactly the same thing but thanks anyway.

and the answer is??

[The_Return]

Originally Posted by Ginger<3

not exactly the same thing but thanks anyway.

and the answer is??

The answer is "No idea, because I cant find the little fucker in any of the stores around here":)

Or:

"Check out the other thread, as other members share some opinions"

[Ginger<3]

i would check the other thread but it's not the answer i asked. i didn't ask if it worth watching ... i asked if it was a bad movie or just annoying that it's not about michael. basically if it was just called season of the witch would it be concidered bad or does it just piss people off that they tried a movie in a totally different direction?

[The_Return]

Originally Posted by Ginger<3

i would check the other thread but it's not the answer i asked. i didn't ask if it worth watching ... i asked if it was a bad movie or just annoying that it's not about michael. basically if it was just called season of the witch would it be concidered bad or does it just piss people off that they tried a movie in a totally different direction?

Hmmm...allow me to introduce some experts to shed some light on your question:

Originally Posted by evil squirrel

...If you kind of ignore the fact that its part of the halloween series it stands alone as (in my opinion) an effective if not slightly flawed film....

Originally Posted by _____V_____

I think its a pretty decent flick, independent of the franchise..

Originally Posted by The Flayed One

...a good attempt at unique franchise....

Any guesses as to my source?

[Ginger<3]

Originally Posted by The_Return

Hmmm...allow me to introduce some experts to shed some light on your question:








Any guesses as to my source?

the source really doesn't interest me ...... the point is the thread's title wasn't what i wanted to know and i'm not going to read it all in hopes to find and answer when i already asked it here especially when i didn't know if i'd get my answer there. had i seen that thread first perhaps i'd have read it on the off chance to see but since i didn't see it first and already made this thread then there's no reason why i couldn't have just gotten my answer right here.

[The_Return]

Originally Posted by Ginger<3

the source really doesn't interest me ...... the point is the thread's title wasn't what i wanted to know and i'm not going to read it all in hopes to find and answer when i already asked it here especially when i didn't know if i'd get my answer there. had i seen that thread first perhaps i'd have read it on the off chance to see but since i didn't see it first and already made this thread then there's no reason why i couldn't have just gotten my answer right here.

No need to get all hot and bothered...I posted a few answers here for you, didnt I?

[Ginger<3]

Originally Posted by The_Return

No need to get all hot and bothered...I posted a few answers here for you, didnt I?

not bothered, just explaining. :D thanks for the answers anyhow.

[crabapple]

A. It has many interesting and entertaining qualities. And atmosphere! B. I own it, and I like watching it. C. I'm not annoyed that Michael Myers isn't in it. I thought the series should have had more films like this in it--most of the sequels are gawdawful, and far worse than this film.