halloween 3 ... bad movie or just annoying because no michael?

[Elvis_Christ]

Originally Posted by bigloader

it's not very nice to criticize people like that. You sound like a real loadeater and someone should blow their load all over your face. Be nice!

Fuck up moron its tired and you're not funny.

[Elvis_Christ]

Originally Posted by bigloader

Why are you always trying to pick on me?

Because I hate you

[Elvis_Christ]

Nothing. I just hate for hates sake.

[Elvis_Christ]

Originally Posted by bigloader

Blah, blah, blah, load, load, blowing loads, some other lame shit, blah

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggght.

Fuck I must be bored :)

[Spec7ral]

return..good for you , you know abou tall the threaeds around, pretty sure its halloween in general and the halloween 3 question will always kick around. the fact that she asked is great. maybe you should post an opinion or some knowledge. anyone who follows M.M knows he wasn't around ofr the 3rd installment and thats one of the reasons its even crazier. peep game.

[The Flayed One]

Guess I'll keep fighting the good fight.

I know you're not actually asking the same question that most people do, Ginger:

"omg wtf wheres mikael lawlz omg whyd u call it halloween what a stupid movie it suxxors"

Which, I'm assuming basically translates to: "Why did they make a Halloween movie without Michael Myers in it?"

I know that's not the question your asking, but before anyone jumps into the thread and asks it I'll just go ahead and explain.

The Halloween series was intended to be original movies that came out every year or so that deal with Halloween and things that happen on the holiday. Michael Myers was never intended to be the franchise villain. However, it seems everyone in the world thought that was the case, and a Halloween movie without Michael didn't go over very well, hence they brought him back.

Now, on to your question, Ginger. Halloween III is not a terrible movie. I'm assuming 90% of the bad rap comes from people not knowing the above when they first see it. It's nothing to right home to the folks about, but it's good cheesy fun. The Silver Shamrock theme song will drive you mad. As far as it being bad just because Michael Myers isn't in it, no. I think a lot of people would agree that IV & V might have been better if it weren't for Michael Myers.

[AmericanManiac]

Edit: Sorry flayed I only read half of the post, then put mine in I just now read it.

[crabapple]

d00d that movie SUCKS lolz i mean wtf michel moyerz waznt even in that film yuk yuk i mean puhleeze yaabbada yaabbada yaabbada whhhoooooo ahhh

i mean, uh,

whoops, sorry! I have that film, it's good.

[urgeok]

there hasnt been a single series with an indestructable killer thats held my interest after the 1st two movies - except phantasm .. because i like the players.


so yeah - Halloween #3 was great..

[Ginger<3]

Originally Posted by The Flayed One

Guess I'll keep fighting the good fight.

I know you're not actually asking the same question that most people do, Ginger:

"omg wtf wheres mikael lawlz omg whyd u call it halloween what a stupid movie it suxxors"

Which, I'm assuming basically translates to: "Why did they make a Halloween movie without Michael Myers in it?"

I know that's not the question your asking, but before anyone jumps into the thread and asks it I'll just go ahead and explain.

The Halloween series was intended to be original movies that came out every year or so that deal with Halloween and things that happen on the holiday. Michael Myers was never intended to be the franchise villain. However, it seems everyone in the world thought that was the case, and a Halloween movie without Michael didn't go over very well, hence they brought him back.

Now, on to your question, Ginger. Halloween III is not a terrible movie. I'm assuming 90% of the bad rap comes from people not knowing the above when they first see it. It's nothing to right home to the folks about, but it's good cheesy fun. The Silver Shamrock theme song will drive you mad. As far as it being bad just because Michael Myers isn't in it, no. I think a lot of people would agree that IV & V might have been better if it weren't for Michael Myers.

wow thank you for answer.

maybe people would have been less annoyed by the change if they'd only made on movie with michael then switched to something else after. like have every movie been unique. i assume after 2 movies with the same person people assumed the 3rd would have michael too then didn't give it a chance when they found out. i don't know why i always skipped over it. now i can't wait to see it.