Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror, But Not Movies > True Crime
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-29-2011, 10:20 AM
Nini_luv5's Avatar
Nini_luv5 Nini_luv5 is offline
The Eater of Worlds <3
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Under your bed >=]
Posts: 424
Osama?

There are theories going around that Osama Bin Laden wasn't the terrorist of the 9/11 attacks at all, but rather just the face of the whole ordeal. Many are saying that there was a ruse that the Iraqi terrorists were just using this man as a cover while the U.S was searching for this man, the terrorists were using this proxy to cover their actual intents.

I tend to believe this could be true. I mean, if I were in any danger of getting caught for something that could sentence me to death I'd find a scapegoat too
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2011, 12:05 PM
TheWickerFan's Avatar
TheWickerFan TheWickerFan is offline
Whip In My Valise
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,647
That sounds like a load of crap.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-29-2011, 12:06 PM
The Villain's Avatar
The Villain The Villain is offline
Evil is Better

 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Your Nightmares
Posts: 6,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWickerFan View Post
That sounds like a load of crap.
I agree with you
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-29-2011, 03:06 PM
Elvis_Christ's Avatar
Elvis_Christ Elvis_Christ is offline
Misanthrope


 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nini_luv5 View Post
There are theories going around that Osama Bin Laden wasn't the terrorist of the 9/11 attacks at all, but rather just the face of the whole ordeal.
There would be a certain amount of truth to that. A lot of leaders are primarily figureheads with people behind them calling some of the shots. Look at Bush...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2011, 03:22 PM
Nini_luv5's Avatar
Nini_luv5 Nini_luv5 is offline
The Eater of Worlds <3
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Under your bed >=]
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ View Post
There would be a certain amount of truth to that. A lot of leaders are primarily figureheads with people behind them calling some of the shots. Look at Bush...

Thank you^^^
And this sounds perfectly logical to me. i mean are we disregarding the fact that these are people, and many may in fact be as strategically cognitive of certain precautions to take as the U.S?

Are you arguing that they cannot have thought to use a scapegoat?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2011, 03:46 PM
TheWickerFan's Avatar
TheWickerFan TheWickerFan is offline
Whip In My Valise
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,647
Who exactly is "they"? Iraq? Afghanistan? Al Qaeda? Are you saying Osama Bin Laden was nothing but a fall guy? And what exactly were we distracted from? There's not enough logic in this theory.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2011, 03:52 PM
Nini_luv5's Avatar
Nini_luv5 Nini_luv5 is offline
The Eater of Worlds <3
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Under your bed >=]
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWickerFan View Post
Who exactly is "they"? Iraq? Afghanistan?Al Quaeda? Are you saying Osama Bin Laden was nothing but a fall guy? And what exactly were we distracted from? There's not enough logic in this theory.
Hey, its not my theory, but "they" i would assume, would be the people responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Which one, i wouldn't know. i don't think anyone has any hard evidence to pinpoint either mentioned.

But i do say that no one can deny, that this is in fact a possibility, as i cannot deny that it may very well be "a load of crap"... as vulgar as that sentiment is...

and i dont believe u answered the question, rather than just respond with several other questions.

Last edited by Nini_luv5; 05-29-2011 at 03:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2011, 04:00 PM
TheWickerFan's Avatar
TheWickerFan TheWickerFan is offline
Whip In My Valise
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,647
When the question is unclear, I need things clarified.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-29-2011, 04:08 PM
Nini_luv5's Avatar
Nini_luv5 Nini_luv5 is offline
The Eater of Worlds <3
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Under your bed >=]
Posts: 424
And i did clarify to the best of my extent.
In order to obtain that "clarification" for you, id need all the answers. Which i do not have.

However, i still stand to say that the question: "Are you arguing that they cannot have thought to use a scapegoat?", can be answered to the best extent of your understanding of the word "they" as well as my response after your question. And being that it is a question of opinion, i wouldn't imagine it being too far past your understanding.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-29-2011, 04:17 PM
TheWickerFan's Avatar
TheWickerFan TheWickerFan is offline
Whip In My Valise
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,647
Let me see if I have this straight. You write in a theory that you didn't come up with, that has zero evidence to back it up, and is extremely vague (to say the least) and get upset when someone questions whether this could possibly be true. Okay. I think I've had my fill of this tomfoolery.:rolleyes:
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 AM.