![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Those are just different reasons for being closed minded, such as not watching a film because it's a remake.
__________________
![]() |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Lucky for us Hollywood isn't nearly smart enough to know what movies had actual merit so they can go back and ruin them. They'll mostly just deal with sacred cows from the 80s. The TCM thing pissed me off but I'm over it and Halloween was somebody actually trying to work with a new vision instead of just glossying up an older movie.
__________________
Horror and Bizarro novelist and editor |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Has any one ever seen the 80's version of THE BAD SEED?
or Night of the Hunter with Richard Chamberlain (now thats a bad idea).. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
what to say. if you enjoy wasting your time for watching something you've already watched, i have no problem with that. that's your time and you can use it however you want. who can judge you?
i'm open-minded and spend my time to see things which are NEW to me, rather than repeating OLD ones. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() What!?!?
__________________
![]() --The Piz is watching you-- |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, cool - I'll have to check it out. Thanks!
Re: Remakes. I actually think that the American remake of The Grudge is better than the original. Then again, this is a singular case; The original Japanese Director Takashi Shimizu had a chance to direct the American version, so his hand was on both of them. I see the American remake as a great chance to edit out what was otherwise a bit rambling and unnecessary in the original. The scares are just as effective, the ghosts just as horrifying, and it cuts out the unnecessary parts. Same director, improving on his first run. So remakes aren't always a bad thing. If they are legitimately trying to improve on the original or if they are trying to "re-envision" a concept (which is still considered improving on it), I think that they are totally justified. Last edited by ChronoGrl; 11-04-2009 at 02:39 PM. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
If I'm not mistaken The Departed condenses all 3 off the Infernal Affairs into one so check em' all out. Good stuff.
__________________
![]() |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, Des. I will. :D
Quote:
I consider "The Thing" to be just a second adaptation of Who Goes There?, and all Frankenstein movies are various adaptations of Mary Shelly's Frankenstein. As for various Wolf Man movies, however, THOSE I would consider remakes. Thoughts? ... Quote:
... Also - I think that this year's My Bloody Valenting 3D was not only a ridiculously fantastic remake, but an homage that completely venerated the genre... And the most fun I've probably had at the movies. Ever. Now THAT'S how you do a remake! |
![]() |
|
|