Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror.com Lobby > Horror.com General Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar

View Poll Results: Today's CGI vs The Make-up of the 70s and 80s
Present Day CGI Effects 2 10.53%
Make-up and Prosthetic Effects of the 70s and 80s 17 89.47%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:13 PM
Staplez's Avatar
Staplez Staplez is offline
People Hate Me
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: End of my rope
Posts: 197
I prefer the older style alot more. Theres just something about CGI that just dosnt do anything for me. I cant put my finger on what it is exactly. Just something that kinda turns me away.

The way things are going it woulnt be long before whole movie are made on computers and they'll be no need for actors.
__________________


MONSTER MONSTER 13 OH YEAH
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:22 PM
newb's Avatar
newb newb is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 19,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by paws the great View Post
I think CGI is fine when used to enhance prosthetics or make-up.
Agreed as well


but straight CGI is also very effective [ Spiderman movies..LOTR movies ]

Hey I grew up on stop motion animation, and while I'll admit...its a bit dated, Ray Harryhausen and the like were pioneers and I love all his stuff but its time to move on.

Give it time and it will all come together.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:20 PM
_____V_____'s Avatar
_____V_____ _____V_____ is offline
For Vendetta
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 31,677
Quote:
Hey I grew up on stop motion animation, and while I'll admit...its a bit dated, Ray Harryhausen and the like were pioneers and I love all his stuff but its time to move on.
Even though it looks dated today, it scared movie audiences out of their seats in its day.

But yes, it had its fair share of time and exposure. Like the others who said it in this thread, CGI and makeup together would be an exciting combo.

And also dont forget, CGI is expensive too...and also takes a lot of time and patience to perfect. Unlike filmmakers to totally rely on CGI, a healthy dose of make-up and prosthetics in today's cinema could enhance its credibility a LOT more.
__________________
"If you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:29 PM
Despare's Avatar
Despare Despare is offline
Evil Puppy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 12,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by _____V_____ View Post
And also dont forget, CGI is expensive too...
Exactly, and we have far too many low budget films using it so poorly because they can't invest the money or time that it ruins the image of this very helpful tool.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:37 PM
_____V_____'s Avatar
_____V_____ _____V_____ is offline
For Vendetta
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 31,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Despare View Post
Exactly, and we have far too many low budget films using it so poorly because they can't invest the money or time that it ruins the image of this very helpful tool.
And low-budget movies of yesteryears had very effective make-up effects which added to their atmosphere. (Just thinking of the budget spent on making Halloween, for instance)

Filmmakers today should take a leaf out of their older counterparts' books and use make-up effects effectively. A movie doesnt have to rely totally on CGI (whether expensive OR cheap) to get the necessary reaction from the audiences.

The best example of a perfect blend IMO would be An American Werewolf in London.
__________________
"If you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-15-2008, 04:48 PM
crabapple's Avatar
crabapple crabapple is offline
AsteroidsDoNotConcernMe

 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,562
Well, being a special effects guy who does both physical and digital effects, I would say, special effects technology is an onward march, and each new innovation sort of adds to the tapestry. There are good and bad applications of everything. A GREAT CG effect, and one I don't think has been topped in some ways, is the "half-melted Billy" effect in "Deep Rising"...it's done mostly with CG "makeup" applied to the actor, and it is beautifully done. I think it redefines what makeup "is" in the digital age.
__________________
************************

Friend....gooooood!

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-16-2008, 03:53 AM
ferretchucker's Avatar
ferretchucker ferretchucker is offline
Ziggy Played Guitar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Just to the left of nowhe
Posts: 10,578
Send a message via MSN to ferretchucker Send a message via Skype™ to ferretchucker
the make up and prosthetics back then for me, are what makes them scary. They haven't all been done that well so they just look...not quite right and films such as the thing and dead alive with all the slime, tearing and messed up faces make them register in your brain as simply wrong and that's what makes them scarier for me.
__________________


The Ferrets like it...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-16-2008, 06:43 AM
Psycom5k's Avatar
Psycom5k Psycom5k is offline
Chrono's Lesbian Lover
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,928
Ya know, if we look at make-up and prostetics of now, versus CGI i'd choose the make-up and prostetics. IT just seems to work better, especially when they use fake blood instead of just adding it in with CGI. Like, if anybody has seen the Day of the Dead remake, though I doubt it because its not supposed to be out until the 8th of april, then they would agree that CGI may be good but its not gonna cut it as of right now. Also.... with zombie movies you don't expect zombies to be able to crawl on the ceilings.... you'll know what I mean when you see Day of the Dead, which fails in comparison to the original.
__________________
Quote:
You're not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-16-2008, 07:10 AM
Marya Zaleska's Avatar
Marya Zaleska Marya Zaleska is offline
The Countess
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the netherworld of Transylvania
Posts: 520
Send a message via Yahoo to Marya Zaleska
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by knife_fight View Post
prosthetics, miniatures, and all practical effects look real because they are real. CGI looks fake because it is fake.

Give me latex or give me death...
or should that be "and give me death" heh heh heh.... :confused:
Right on! You hit the nail on the head!



Countess Marya
__________________


The Countess
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-16-2008, 08:02 AM
jenna26's Avatar
jenna26 jenna26 is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,960
Send a message via MSN to jenna26
I can appreciate both, if done well. I do usually prefer the old way of doing things, it looks better and its just more fun. But I don't mind CGI if it is not ridiculously over done, like the CGI nightmare that is Van Helsing. :rolleyes:
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.