Land Of The Dead II

[Nyarlathotep]

Originally posted by urgeok
gotta catch 'em all !

that could be the tagline

[urgeok]

Originally posted by Nyarlathotep
that could be the tagline

it could !! but dont take my word for it - ask these guys :

[urgeok]

i have to admit ...


this is the 1st time i've ever been sexually attracted to pikachu ..

[Nyarlathotep]

Originally posted by urgeok
i have to admit ...


this is the 1st time i've ever been sexually attracted to pikachu ..

nice um er.....dimples

[urgeok]

Originally posted by Nyarlathotep
nice um er.....dimples

yeah, you dont usually see ....dimples quite so .... pronounced on asian girls.

[knife_fight]

Originally posted by subjugator
eh, this might be stupid but did anyone else think that when the fireworks "hypnotized" the zombies that it was symbolic of Americans just blindly following along with their government?

as far as political commentary, I only took it as an all-out class war. with the poor rising up against those who have held em down for so long. the poor first must go through the middle class then move on to the people who are really in charge, the rich.

like the people in the building were obviously the rich, the rest of the living were the middle class, and the zombies were the poor and homeless. I guess the main characters could be considered the upper-middle-class. so maybe they let em go at the end b/c the upper-middle-class people had a grudge against the rich also.

maybe Romero is calling for a revolution in this country that is strongly based on a class system, even though no one actually calls it that.

but, maybe not...

[urgeok]

Originally posted by knife_fight
as far as political commentary, I only took it as an all-out class war. with the poor rising up against those who have held em down for so long. the poor first must go through the middle class then move on to the people who are really in charge, the rich.

like the people in the building were obviously the rich, the rest of the living were the middle class, and the zombies were the poor and homeless. I guess the main characters could be considered the upper-middle-class. so maybe they let em go at the end b/c the upper-middle-class people had a grudge against the rich also.

maybe Romero is calling for a revolution in this country that is strongly based on a class system, even though no one actually calls it that.

but, maybe not...

yeah the 'have' vs 'have not' scenario was pretty out there .. not at all symbolic..

but the funny twist is that the 'have nots' want what the 'haves' got, and it aint money :D

[knife_fight]

Originally posted by urgeok
but the funny twist is that the 'have nots' want what the 'haves' got, and it aint money :D

ain't it the damn truth.

I was mainly talking about how the society was set up. with the rich at the center and the poorer they got moving outward in concentric circles.

[lionels_mother]

Originally posted by The_Return
City of the Dead could get confused with Fulci's City of the Living Dead. Not by mainstrem audiences of course, but by true horror fans and film buffs. I think Dusk or Twilight of the dead would be the best titles...

lol... I had this convo with my girlf last night! We came up with either 'Brunch of the Dead' or 'Early Evening of the Dead'.

[Zero]

i read the politics of LOTD as all about 9/11 and a kind of critique of the Bush - let's get strong and kill everyone else. . . i thought that's why the zombies were, for the most part, more sympathetic and the human raiders - at the beginning, almost seemed like the bad guys