Canibble exploitation movies:which is the best

[Tat2]

Originally posted by Vodstok
From what i have seen, it should be ca-gorge. How do they not get fat eating entire people?

Uhhhh...Tape worms?

[EXTR3MIST]

That outboard-motor bit was Zombie Holocaust, slasherman.

All three of these cannibal movies are top drawer exploitation, Mothman (there are not enough girls in this forum).

Holocaust is the most serious and effective effort, Ferox is more wreckless and trashy but with some outrageously savage gore (that nob-slicing scene outdoes the one in Deodato's movie - ouch!) and Apocalypse (set mostly in the city rather than the jungle) chugs along nicely with some tasty Gianetto De Rossi makeup effects (he did the gore for likes of Zombie Flesh Eaters, The Beyond, The Living Dead at Manchester Morgue and the recent Switchblade Romance/Haute Tension).

Note that these must all be seen uncut however, and bear in mind the first two here both feature almost unwatchable real animal killings.

[aborted]

ive only ever seen cannibal holocaust but i thought it was great because in watching this movie i had a physical reaction to a one part in it and for that its good in my books:) . but the killing of real animals was a little sick but reasonable in the contex of this movie.

[EXTR3MIST]

Hmmm - presumably you would draw the line at really killing humans to depict murder in films though?

This distinction between the worth of each species in the name of making art is rather worrying, and thankfully no-one could legally get away with animal slaughter as filmed entertainment today.

Paradoxically, or rather hypocritically on my part, it is the inclusion of these difficult scenes that give spaghetti cannibal movies their edge (and why we talk about them with such intrigue) - and asks the question of what really stirs us inside sometimes.

[urgeok]

Originally posted by EXTR3MIST
Paradoxically, or rather hypocritically on my part, it is the inclusion of these difficult scenes that give spaghetti cannibal movies their edge (and why we talk about them with such intrigue) - and asks the question of what really stirs us inside sometimes.

i think there is more than enough bad taste in these films for people to talk about them - without killing animals .. most of us are aware people arent really getting killed.

of course the discussions will continue and 90% of the people all say the same damn thing: 'i wish they didnt kill the animals'

not very stimulating - or intriguing

and to clarify .. bad taste on its own isnt for me neccessary a bad thing ... it can be fun..

oh, and I wouldnt watch movies where people were really getting killed - and i can deal with animals getting killed if i know its fake.

and i know star wars wasnt really shot in space.

[slasherman]

Originally posted by EXTR3MIST
That outboard-motor bit was Zombie Holocaust, slasherman.

are you sure ?....I'm pretty sure it was "Ferox"....in the woods with a outboard-motor crushing a face ?

[The Mothman]

Note that these must all be seen uncut however, and bear in mind the first two here both feature almost unwatchable real animal killings.

Oh, Fuck this!!!

I'd rather have them kill real people.

poor defencless animals.:( :(

what kind of animals btw? better not be any cute ones.

[aborted]

Originally posted by The Mothman
Oh, Fuck this!!!

I'd rather have them kill real people.

poor defencless animals.:( :(

what kind of animals btw? better not be any cute ones.

in CH it was a hog, some kind of rat, and the turtel that almost made me turn it off. also i recently rewatched it agian and skipped over the cruelty and i found that the deaths of the people didnt seem as realistic. thats why i think the animal deaths are in it, to make the fake deaths look real.

[zwoti]

Originally posted by slasherman
are you sure ?....I'm pretty sure it was "Ferox"....in the woods with a outboard-motor crushing a face ?

nope......it was zombi holocaust (aka dr butcher MD)

[The Mothman]

a turtle WTF!!!?? thats almost funny. they are cute and all, but that just doesnt fit too well.