|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#1
12-11-2004, 10:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
house 1 and 2?
ok so whats the deal with these two flicks, I saw them at best buy the other day and they looked interseting. can someone give me a little insight wether or not these are good movies, and whats the gore factor, ext. ext.
__________________
IM DIRECTING THIS F*CKING MOO-VAY! As I was going up the stairs, I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today, I wish I wish he'd go away . 
|
|
#2
12-11-2004, 11:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
OMG!...I love these movies...I have House (Ding Dong You're Dead), House 2 (The Second Story), House 3 (Which actually has NOTHING to do with the other 'House' movies (Just like 'Halloween 3, Season Of The Witch')...It's called 'The Horror Show')...and House 4 (Which SHOULD have been the actual 'House 3' movie, but since 'The Horror Show' used that title, they had to call it 'Part 4')
Here's the info on them... House...1986 House 2...1987 House 3, The Horror Show...1989 House 4...1992 As for what type of movies they are and the gore factor...Hmmm...Think 'Evil Dead' movies...They are a LOT like those, except the Evil Deads get better and better, these just kinda go like most other sequels...The first one is the best, and the other two lose a little bit as they go along, but still great in my opinion...They are kinda funny, too...The second one is the funniest :cool: Now I wanna go watch them again :D
__________________
...  If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance...Baffle 'em with bullshit My Karma ran over my Dogma God WAS my co-pilot...But, we crashed in the mountains and...I had to eat him I'm suffocating in what's become of me... The rancid remains of what I used to be
|
|
#3
12-13-2004, 08:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have to agree with the above post, movies are good and lame at the same time. the second one is quite hilarious I must say. Especially the old guy "shootin' blanks" as he says haha. On the same token how fun would it be to have all these different 'worlds' connected to your house that you could go explore and fight baddies in?
__________________
Those who dance are thought mad by those who do no hear the music
|
|
#4
12-13-2004, 09:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i thought House 1 was ok.
It was populated by TV personalities which i never like. The 'comedy' was distracting. The war scenes were bad especially when you consider the quality war films that were out at the time. (personal peeve .. i hate low budget war films and sequences) If it was redone as a serious horror film it might be ok .. House 2 looked at what made house 1 a success and rehashed the formula. I though it was crap (and i saw it at the theatre) i have a real problem with TV actors (esp. comedy series). They have the same style as stage actors .. they project too much and have pauses in their delivery like they are waiting for laughs. Its very unnatural and bugs the hell out of me. Occasionaly an actor can make the transition successfully but its rare.
|
|
#5
12-13-2004, 03:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: house 1 and 2?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#7
12-14-2004, 10:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Fear is in the mind of the beholder. If that mind is strong engough fear can be defated. If the minds is weak, and the fear is storng, the fear will control the life. THe fear couldn't be defeated the life would be controled by it forevere.
|
 |
|
|
