|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#1
10-09-2003, 02:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No F/X in the horror movies?
Older horrors were made without F/Xs or F/Xs were very poor. That films, in my opinion of course, were terrifing as fuck. No F/Xs, no colour, old horror films frightened very effectively. Directors tried scared the viwer differently than now doing it. "Those" films have uniqe mysterious climate and full of darkness. Sometimes a little comicaly:) but first of all horryfing.
Today, most of directors, in my opinion of course, have no idea what make good horror movies. No identity-film-makers produce identical movies. This is way to nowhere. Any thoughts?? 
|
|
#2
10-09-2003, 06:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good thing there are effects like these, or horror movies would suck
__________________
"I don't care if you were covered in peanut butter and had a 15 hooker gang-bang"-Adam(SAW) Last edited by Killer Clown#1; 10-09-2003 at 06:19 PM.
|
|
#4
10-09-2003, 06:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Same here, I like make up
__________________
"I don't care if you were covered in peanut butter and had a 15 hooker gang-bang"-Adam(SAW)
|
|
#6
10-10-2003, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I prefer the 70`s horror... I really dont like this new shit that is being made and never will like it...In fact I dislike 75% if 80`s shit..
|
|
#7
10-11-2003, 01:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
hmmm...
dont get me wrong I love makeup. but i do think CG has its place. take underworld (think what you like about the film were just talking about the effects). While the bullet time shit was pretty hoaky, I really admire the fact that they made that movie 80% makeup 20% cg when they could have done the whole thing in cg. I just think that shows some appreciation for the art. Overall I think that CG should just be done to accentuate, not replace.
|
|
#8
10-11-2003, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to agree with nightbreed here to a point, but not all movies would be rewarded by the use of cgi to help with the effects. This is one reason that I liked House of 1000 corpses, he kept the effects to real stuff, make-up and the like without the use of cgi and still produced quite the elaborate sets and characters. (Dr. Satan for instance :D ). So I suppose it just depends on what sort of movie it is and what appeal you are going for overall.
|
|
#9
10-12-2003, 07:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why go CGI when there are people like the KNB effects group?
__________________
"You think that when you die you go to heaven. You come to US!."
|
|
#10
10-13-2003, 08:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
perfect example of how cgi can inhance a scene without taking it over. interview with a vampire. the scene where louis "dies" and comes back as a vampire. if you know what im talking about Im sure youll agree. if you dont remember it clearly watch it again.
|
 |
|
|
