![]() |
Quote:
4 looked totally repetitive. I d say its beyond the saturation point. |
Quote:
sure it is ... its basically Friday the 13th for the 2000's a slight lean to the grindhouse sensibility - but basically the same thing : repetition, comfortable familiarity ... and young fans happy to support a new franchise. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Doesn't mean I d like it. I thought the first one was overdone, and the rest followed suit. It started off pretty interestingly, but 2 and 3 were real eyerollers. I d rather watch Tim Burton snap off heads in Sleepy Hollow. Based on a book, yes, but awesome movie...also, doesn't have Sleepy Hollow 2, 3, 4 etc. etc. after it too. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
nothing should be pre-judged. |
Quote:
Look what happened to Grindhouse at the BO. Doesn't deter it from my Top 10 post-2000 one bit. The one thing which makes PG 13 sell is the pre- and post- teen audience. They are the target groups. And studios are smart about knowing EXACTLY where to rake the moolah in from. A movie doesn't fare by its quality anymore. It's just a dish now - the more attractive the dish, the more chances it has of getting lapped up. |
pg-13 is a subtle way of knowing accessibility over content. there are exceptions where the plot can overshadow and chill. there are the classics like i noted before. hell, you can even be surprised from time to time with a good horror flick, like some of you mentioned that didn't even pop in my mind.
rated r still says horror to me. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 AM. |