|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#51
04-27-2005, 09:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Big round things huh :rolleyes: why doesn't that suprise me.
|
|
#53
04-28-2005, 01:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
yo urg, you fucked your self on that one.
as for the paris hilton thing, shes hot. she has a banging body and a nice ass. not to mention her oral skills. if she is naked in the film its only cause she gets paid this time around. il admit i wouldnt mind seeing cuthburt nude bt she has absolutly refused to do a nude scene( ever, she almos lost her role in girl next door for refusing to do a nude scene). as for urg always saying he wants to see boobs all the time on this thred isnt true, i started it and he just reacently started saying it alot. i personaly jack off about 15 times a day. it builds stanima. and yes i do have a girl, and we do fuck( at least 3 times a week, at least) and she has a great rack( 36 c). hell all guys do it( all of them).
__________________
you lied to me.
|
|
#54
04-28-2005, 02:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i just stick up for my girl Paris :D
i dont care if she's stupid, i've never heard her say a word .. it just kills me when people start saying she's physically ugly .. as if any guy on this board would turn down a girl who looked like her because of her physical appearance. .. yeah, right.
|
|
#55
04-28-2005, 02:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#56
04-28-2005, 02:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
oh on her ? why let a scrap of cloth get in the way of my teeth ? :) i wonder if anyone else thought of the name Penis Hilt-in just me ?
|
|
#57
05-01-2005, 07:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
See, to me, she's just an average looking girl. Don't get me wrong, she's hot, but in a very average way. You could find the same type looks a lot by just walking around town.
And back to the reason of this forum, related to Paris, I just think that if they're going to try to remake a classic movie like this, they at least need to look farther for a cast than a couple of teens who have only been in teen "close-to-soap" TV shows and homemade pornos. Does ANYONE else agree with me?!
|
|
#58
05-01-2005, 07:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I wouldn´t call "House of wax" a classic...:rolleyes:
__________________
I'm right. It's the rest of the world that's wrong.
|
|
#59
05-02-2005, 04:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I do. So, uh. Sorry you disagree? Whatever I just don't think it'll be good, due to a lack of acting. You can all have fun seeing another "Darkness Falls", "Boogeyman" and "Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003)" like waste of 7 bucks.
|
|
#60
05-03-2005, 12:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
the reason that you see so many girls like her is because the all copied off her look, and she still looks the best. also if you were hopeing for the movie to stick to the originals plot, you will be sad to hear it dosnt. the only thing that the remake and the original have in common are the title and people covered in wax( makes for some great but painful forplay). the movie comes out this friday in america, i dont know about the rest of the world but im seeing it friday at 3:30
__________________
you lied to me.
|
 |
|
|
