Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror.com Lobby > Horror.com General Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 05-22-2008, 05:47 AM
_____V_____'s Avatar
_____V_____ _____V_____ is offline
For Vendetta
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 31,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by urgeok2 View Post
they seem to have hit the wall as far as processing speed goes ... getting things smaller seems to be the focus now.

i'm sure the technology exixts to make a computer the size of a watch now (or soon) it's just cost prohibitive at this time
Very true.

But with dual core, Core 2 duo, Quad Core chips flooding the market, I am sure we will see a ground-breaking innovation in that field too.

Its just a matter of time...we will have a superchip with blazing processing speed soon.
__________________
"If you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-22-2008, 06:05 AM
Vodstok's Avatar
Vodstok Vodstok is offline
Fear scented candle
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The edge of forever
Posts: 13,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by _____V_____ View Post
Very true.

But with dual core, Core 2 duo, Quad Core chips flooding the market, I am sure we will see a ground-breaking innovation in that field too.

Its just a matter of time...we will have a superchip with blazing processing speed soon.
intel particularly is looking into making spuer multicore chips: 32, 48, 64, 128 and even 256. the problem is that without applications that are designed to use the multiple processors, you can have a million 2.2 ghz processors, and it will only run on one, so no faster.

Intel is investing a ton in teaching programmers to write multithreaded scalable programs (that means it can change how many processors it can run on all by itself) to take advantage of the technology. If anyone has ever run a multithreaded program next to a single threaded version of the same thing (i have written a few), you would be amazed at the difference. maybe ill make a sample just so people can see.

They have hit a wall with the speed of the chips, with modern technology at least, so they are stacking them next to each other now. think of it this way, if you can have, maximum, 8 cylanders in an engine, do you figureout how to make the cylanders smaller, or do you stick another engine in the car?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-25-2008, 02:28 PM
novakru's Avatar
novakru novakru is offline
Waste Disposer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: suburban hell
Posts: 5,421
Whatever happened to those scientists ( I have no idea who exactly "those people" are)
working on quantum physics??
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-26-2008, 04:44 AM
Abominus's Avatar
Abominus Abominus is offline
Some sort of shouty cat
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 543
Send a message via MSN to Abominus
They're all here in Kitchener/Waterloo plotting to take over the world.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 AM.