|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#31
05-22-2004, 08:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think they should've made the bad ones
|
|
#32
05-22-2004, 11:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i thought The Eye was highly over rated, not a BAD movie, or even one that shouldnt have been made, in fact its much better than the majority of hollywood trash, erm i mean horror) today, but still overrated i think....
|
|
#33
05-22-2004, 11:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
hills have eyes 2 - craven did it for the money, still not an excuse
blair witch fear dot com ghost ship vanishing - why reamke it? nightwatch - even worse remake. american werewolf in paris - should have gone with landis' story
|
 |
|
|
