![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
What he said
Ive been meaning to check out the newer version, but I just never bother with it. Liked the book and would be kinda interested in seeing how a more faithful adaption works...I dont know, it just doesnt really look that great.
__________________
"There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness." - Friedrich Nietzsche |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
kubrick & nicholson or garris & stephen weber
no contest |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
I was never a big fan of the original film. It's okay, but to me it's not the classic everyone else thinks it is. To each their own. I liked the remake a whole lot more.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
i have yet to see remake |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Its Kubrick for me too. I've seen the conclusion of the '97 version and to me the acting seemed forced. That's why Nicholson was such a great man for the role... he didn't have to act:D .
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
yeah nothing beats kubricks version....i cant and ive tried twice to watch the other and i just cant......nicholson is a legend
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Who are you and what have you done with an actual human being?
__________________
If you're bored laugh at some of my work at http://www.digital-renegades.co.uk/michael 1,2 Michael's coming for you...3,4 Better lock your door...5,6 Grab a crucifix...7,8 Better stay up late...9,10 Never sleep again. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Im probably gonna read the book then watch the 1980 version then the 1997 version. Is this a good plan?
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
I thought it was just as good as the psycho remake......bad.
|
![]() |
|
|