Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Classic Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 01-04-2005, 10:08 AM
EXTR3MIST's Avatar
EXTR3MIST EXTR3MIST is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 1,162
Whoa, hold it there crazy people.

While we all have our movie favourites, the original Return of the Living Dead crackled with dry (and slapstick) humour, outrageous nods to Romero's Dead series (take note on how NOT to come across a smug know-all git, Mr. Craven), some splendid latex gore (check out 'Tarman'... "MORE brains!"), memorable characters (Thom Matthews, Clu Gulager, James Karen & Linnea Quigley in particular) and dedicated, lively writing and direction from the excellent Dan O' Bannon.

Compare this to the lacklustre and bland 90 minutes of Ken Wiederhorn's Part 2, featuring - horror of horrors - a young mouthy blond kid as the main protagonist, a lot of running about and falling over outside (eliminating the claustrophobic atmosphere of the original and Romero's movies), and some shockingly bad attempts at gore effects (nifty 'half-zombie' scene excepted) such as the cruddy bits-of-liver-hanging-out-of-the-mouths attempts to convey zombie cannibalism and those ghastly animated blue electricity bolts.

ROTLD is a punk rock gorefest with plenty of quality splatter and nudity - Part 2 is simply... well, a shit movie - as a sequel or a standalone zombie effort. Instead, watch Wiederhorn's eerie Shock Waves or nasty Eyes of a Stranger.

Part 3 criticised for not being funny? It's a fucking masterpiece tragic love story with some fantastic rubbery gore (USA viewers note; lots of this was cut in your country - surprisingly released uncut in the UK) - why downbeat themes and endings are seen as a turnoff to some people is a mystery... total misunderstanding of horror films from the word go, perhaps ?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-04-2005, 04:34 PM
Sedated_replica's Avatar
Sedated_replica Sedated_replica is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Come on kids, do whatever you want
Posts: 1,823
Send a message via AIM to Sedated_replica Send a message via Yahoo to Sedated_replica
Wait, so two movies can be a parody but the Third has to be Serious?..... thats retarded
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-07-2005, 11:59 AM
The_Return's Avatar
The_Return The_Return is offline
AKA Vampenguin/Dark_Hero

 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,540
Send a message via AIM to The_Return
Im all about The Frighteners
__________________
"There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-07-2005, 12:29 PM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
we're getting away from horror parodies and confusing them with horror comedies
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-07-2005, 12:41 PM
Hate_Breeder's Avatar
Hate_Breeder Hate_Breeder is offline
Tonight belongs to HIM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Cage
Posts: 8,059
Quote:
Originally posted by EXTR3MIST
Whoa, hold it there crazy people.

While we all have our movie favourites, the original Return of the Living Dead crackled with dry (and slapstick) humour, outrageous nods to Romero's Dead series (take note on how NOT to come across a smug know-all git, Mr. Craven), some splendid latex gore (check out 'Tarman'... "MORE brains!"), memorable characters (Thom Matthews, Clu Gulager, James Karen & Linnea Quigley in particular) and dedicated, lively writing and direction from the excellent Dan O' Bannon.

Compare this to the lacklustre and bland 90 minutes of Ken Wiederhorn's Part 2, featuring - horror of horrors - a young mouthy blond kid as the main protagonist, a lot of running about and falling over outside (eliminating the claustrophobic atmosphere of the original and Romero's movies), and some shockingly bad attempts at gore effects (nifty 'half-zombie' scene excepted) such as the cruddy bits-of-liver-hanging-out-of-the-mouths attempts to convey zombie cannibalism and those ghastly animated blue electricity bolts.

ROTLD is a punk rock gorefest with plenty of quality splatter and nudity - Part 2 is simply... well, a shit movie - as a sequel or a standalone zombie effort. Instead, watch Wiederhorn's eerie Shock Waves or nasty Eyes of a Stranger.

Part 3 criticised for not being funny? It's a fucking masterpiece tragic love story with some fantastic rubbery gore (USA viewers note; lots of this was cut in your country - surprisingly released uncut in the UK) - why downbeat themes and endings are seen as a turnoff to some people is a mystery... total misunderstanding of horror films from the word go, perhaps ?
Well i know why your called the "Extremist," now.
__________________
www.myspace.com/themostsadistic
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:04 PM
Sedated_replica's Avatar
Sedated_replica Sedated_replica is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Come on kids, do whatever you want
Posts: 1,823
Send a message via AIM to Sedated_replica Send a message via Yahoo to Sedated_replica
Quote:
Originally posted by urgeok
we're getting away from horror parodies and confusing them with horror comedies
This might be a dumb question. But whats the different bewteen a comedy and a paraody? Is their serious parodies???
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-09-2005, 10:26 AM
slasherman's Avatar
slasherman slasherman is offline
.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 4,026
Quote:
Originally posted by Sedated_replica
This might be a dumb question. But whats the different bewteen a comedy and a paraody? Is their serious parodies???
In parodies they make funn of other films/scenes.....but i guess its under the genre comedy or :confused:
__________________

Last edited by slasherman; 01-09-2005 at 10:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-09-2005, 01:49 PM
EXTR3MIST's Avatar
EXTR3MIST EXTR3MIST is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 1,162
Apart from some lame in-jokes (like the woeful "Michael Jackson" zombie), ROTLD Part 2, however hard it tried, wasn't so much a horror parody - and certainly not of the Romero films like the first instalment - as it was a daft "party" zombie movie.

More farce and comedy than cute tribute to the monumental Dead series like Part 1.

As far as the third instalment being "retardedly" serious... this was a masterstroke - Brian Yuzna turned Wiederhorn's tiresome effort on its head with a suprisingly straight approach to a doomed zombie love story... complete with some awesome spine-ripping, skin-puncturing gore to boot!

If this film doesn't sit well because the Return of the Living Dead series is supposed to be all about parody, then that's fair enough - but I find the evolution of Part 3 from the ashes of the second movie one of the best horror experiences of modern times.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-09-2005, 03:17 PM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
Quote:
Originally posted by Sedated_replica
This might be a dumb question. But whats the different bewteen a comedy and a paraody? Is their serious parodies???

a horror comedy is just that .. a movie blending horror with comedy..

a parody is a comedic version of something serious ..
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-09-2005, 05:23 PM
Elvis_Christ's Avatar
Elvis_Christ Elvis_Christ is offline
Misanthrope


 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,479
The second ROTLD is really shit, the first and third one are way better. My favorites would be Re-aminator, Return of the Living Dead, and Reposessed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 AM.