|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#31
10-23-2004, 06:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The obvious reason why Ringu scared me and The Ring didn't is I've seen Ringu before really. They're pretty much the same. I don't mind slow paces, but, for a movie to give me nightmares, it needs to contain a lot of scares.
__________________
the illusion of fire is so perfect that it burns http://www.terror.ca 
|
|
#32
10-28-2004, 04:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It is clearly not a favourite of many expectant horror fans, but it is unfathomable how this brutally simple and effective film leaves many non-the-wiser as to what they have just experienced. Without drawing too many distinctions between how people actually watch films, perhaps it is simply a case of one man's thrillride is another man's snoozefest.
|
|
#33
10-28-2004, 12:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ringu didn't do anything for me....the volcano bit seemed a bit more forced...althought the samara backstory was a bit more fleshed out in Ringu....
It scared me less, impressed me less, no subliminal quick shots like in the Ring, i love that shit, and the ending TV scene did nothing for me in Ringu....to each his own....
|
|
#34
10-28-2004, 12:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I got the Jap ring boxset the other day, watched Ring and thought it was quite good.... I'm going to be optimistic with the other two, as I dont want negatvity I've read about them here, to affect the viewing.
:)
|
|
#36
10-28-2004, 12:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ring
Ring 2 Ring 0
|
|
#38
10-28-2004, 12:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#40
10-28-2004, 12:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
imo there was no need for the 3 prequals.
|
 |
|
|
