Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror.com Lobby > Horror.com General Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:27 AM
Baldi Baldi is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15
You didn't fail because of the question, you failed because of your answer. Can you post it for us to read? ;)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:29 AM
Malicious_Mirth's Avatar
Malicious_Mirth Malicious_Mirth is offline
Holy Light of Judgement
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 890
Send a message via AIM to Malicious_Mirth
hahaha great point!!
__________________
Concerning the universe.

AREA: infinite.
The Hitchickers guide to the galaxy provides this definition of the word infinite.
Bigger than the biggest thing ever and then some. Much bigger than that in fact, really amazingly immense, a totally stunning size, real "wow thats big," time. Infinity is just so big that, by comparison, bigness itself looks really quite titchy. Gigantic multiplied by colossal multiplied by staggeringly huge is the sort of concept were trying to get across here.

IMPORTS: none
It is impossible to import things into an infinite area, there being no outside to import things in from.

EXPORTS: none
(see imports)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:35 AM
fluffho's Avatar
fluffho fluffho is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jay's cornhole
Posts: 3,170
Send a message via AIM to fluffho Send a message via Yahoo to fluffho
Quote:
Originally posted by wufong
pfft wait till they give a essay question like. two men who kidnap a woman and force her to take them to a atm so they can take her cash. and you have to give a 500 hundred word answer as to why that is a crime against society........ i failed on that.........:rolleyes:
not sure if ur being serious. but because
1) that woman couldve been anyone
2) we dont live singularly, but as a community. not only is she affected, but her family, the bank, etc...
3) relates to both, but becuase this instills fear on everyone, not to mention when people start doin this type of shit, and are successful, will continue and only get worse from there
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:57 AM
Baldi Baldi is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15
Well, for the record, I would have talked about our freedoms, how our society depends on our freedoms, and how our freedoms define us as a nation. This one persons loss of freedom means we all lose some of our freedoms, and we question the fabric of our society.

But then, I can be geeky sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-18-2004, 03:00 AM
fluffho's Avatar
fluffho fluffho is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jay's cornhole
Posts: 3,170
Send a message via AIM to fluffho Send a message via Yahoo to fluffho
very good answer

from a law point of view was where i was coming from although i didnt elaborate well enough to convey that.

urs is more philosophical, but coulda gone that route as well. actually, i prefer that route. much more leeway (or whatever the hell that word is..)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-18-2004, 03:17 AM
Baldi Baldi is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15
Leeway? Sometimes I call it, "you can waffle a lot and say nothing" :D

You were right with the laws - but the laws effect some of our freedoms, limit them. They exist to tell us what we can, and cannot, do. Therefore, they restrict our freedom.

Man, you could talk about that for hours :D
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-18-2004, 03:23 AM
wufong's Avatar
wufong wufong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 981
no i was being serious. but i answered with a mixure of both what you and baldi said. a bit on the legal side and on the personal effect it had on the victim.and baldi no i don't have it. even though that part was done by mail, it was a few years ago now. I mainly failed on the wording of the answer.it was in the first lot of modules that they sent out and i didnt really know what was the right thing to write. but the good thing is the ydon't really expect a perfect answer at that time in the course. just looking for some general idea on your thoughts on the matter. yet i still bombed out for not going into enough detail into the matter
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-18-2004, 02:09 PM
fluffho's Avatar
fluffho fluffho is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jay's cornhole
Posts: 3,170
Send a message via AIM to fluffho Send a message via Yahoo to fluffho
Quote:
Originally posted by Baldi
Leeway? Sometimes I call it, "you can waffle a lot and say nothing" :D

You were right with the laws - but the laws effect some of our freedoms, limit them. They exist to tell us what we can, and cannot, do. Therefore, they restrict our freedom.

Man, you could talk about that for hours :D
yep. but in most cases (havent really read all of the 22 something codes, never will so i cant give even a guess to a %), our freedoms are restricted in exchange for security. you can only drive 25 on neighborhood streets, but that increases safety for the people living there. a good trade off, i think

wufong, i wonder how you bombed it? but you did say it was the wording so maybe thats why. could have the correct meaning but perhaps you didnt convey it quite accurately? hard to say without actually seeing what you wrote.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-18-2004, 06:52 PM
fluffho's Avatar
fluffho fluffho is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jay's cornhole
Posts: 3,170
Send a message via AIM to fluffho Send a message via Yahoo to fluffho
"Driving a vehicle in the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, but without gross negligence; or driving a vehicle in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death, in an unlwaful manner, but without gross negligence"

I HAVE BEEN READING THIS TYPE OF SHIT FOR OVER AN HOUR!! aND I STIL HAVE 6 MORE PAGES.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHH

and it gets better!

"Driving a vehicle in violation of section........ and in the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, but with gross negligence; or driving a vehicle in violatoin of .... and i the commission of a lawful act whcih might produce death, in an unlawful manner but withou gross negligence"

WTF IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN. ISNT THAT THE SAME THING? CAN SOMEBODY CLUE ME IN? especially the "commission of a lawful act which might produce death" part. SAVE ME SAVE ME SAVE ME
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-18-2004, 11:03 PM
fluffho's Avatar
fluffho fluffho is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jay's cornhole
Posts: 3,170
Send a message via AIM to fluffho Send a message via Yahoo to fluffho
Time spent: 4 min. 30 sec.
Student finished 15 min. 30 sec. ahead of the 20 min. time limit.

Total score: 15 / 15 = 100.0%

I KICK SO MUCH ASS. WOO WOO!! :D
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 AM.