|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#21
01-13-2007, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
which version of The Shining do you all like better?
I personally like Stephen King's The Shining ('97) better than the 1980 Jack Nicholson version.
Everyone thinks i'm crazy! I haven't seen every second of the 1980 version, but I found it kind of...boring. Maybe i wasn't paying enough attention. 
|
|
#22
01-13-2007, 04:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You weren't paying enough attention.
Stanley Kubrick's version (1980) is much better, although much farther from the book. It's a good example, though, of a movie that strayed away from the book and worked well. Jack Nicholson is outstanding!
__________________
|
|
#23
01-13-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll give it another try.
It was a long time ago. What did you think of the 1997 version?
|
|
#24
01-13-2007, 04:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not bad, but something didn't quite click with me.
__________________
|
|
#25
01-13-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I prefer the cast of the orignal, but the location of the latter version
But both versions were nowhere near as good as the book
|
|
#26
01-13-2007, 07:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gotta go with the Kubrick version.
__________________
Lee Widener, Author Website  Cartoon Artwork, Underground Art, Other Weird Stuff 
|
|
#27
01-13-2007, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
never read it.
|
|
#28
01-13-2007, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ending is so much better.... Alot more violent......
He caves his own face in with a roque mallet.... then chases his son around without a face..... Wendy get the hell beat out of her and the other guy gets it aswell.....
|
|
#29
01-13-2007, 08:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kubrick's is alot better,but I do like the new one.
|
|
#30
01-13-2007, 09:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have only seen the Kubrick version:o ...and that was awsome.
__________________
@Letterboxd
|
 |
|
|
