Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Classic Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 05-21-2006, 07:48 PM
voorhees_fan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
let us hope to god they dont give us a remake of this classic, and if they do that its not bunker full of running CGI zombies.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-22-2006, 12:30 PM
Red Grrr's Avatar
Red Grrr Red Grrr is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 12
Send a message via AIM to Red Grrr
they're probably gonna remake day, they just wait a long time between making dead films (old and remakes), maybe it won't suck, but it most likely will. :(
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:16 PM
ItsAlive75's Avatar
ItsAlive75 ItsAlive75 is offline
Image of the Invisible
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 6,357
Send a message via AIM to ItsAlive75
Quote:
Originally posted by voorhees_fan
let us hope to god they dont give us a remake of this classic, and if they do that its not bunker full of running CGI zombies.
Production started in March
__________________
MISINTUPITATED- The act of removing the spine by use of fire.

DEVESTED- The removal of one's vest.

SCTUPP- To deficate on a woman after nonconsensual sex.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:28 PM
Red Grrr's Avatar
Red Grrr Red Grrr is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 12
Send a message via AIM to Red Grrr
wow, haha, wasn't expecting that
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:46 PM
The Thing's Avatar
The Thing The Thing is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Antarctic
Posts: 23
Day of the Dead. Quite spooky that the remake's mentioned cause i just found it in wilkipedia along with other films. I hate to break it you dudes but if you didn't like the recent remake of The Hills Have Eyes well, they're making a second film. The remake was cool in my opinion but i have my doubts about this...:(
__________________
"The world is yours"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:57 PM
Red Grrr's Avatar
Red Grrr Red Grrr is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 12
Send a message via AIM to Red Grrr
yeah, i liked the remake of hills have eyes, the original was still better, though. maybe the new one won't be too bad.

this is totally off the subject, but speaking of wikipedia, am i the only one obsessed with that stupid thing? i go on to look up on little thing and next thing you know, ive been on it for five hours looking up all this stuff i don't really care about. :/
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-22-2006, 05:51 PM
ItsAlive75's Avatar
ItsAlive75 ItsAlive75 is offline
Image of the Invisible
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 6,357
Send a message via AIM to ItsAlive75
I heard a recent report saying most of the info is just false or fake.
__________________
MISINTUPITATED- The act of removing the spine by use of fire.

DEVESTED- The removal of one's vest.

SCTUPP- To deficate on a woman after nonconsensual sex.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-23-2006, 06:59 AM
voorhees_fan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Where is all this news coming from though? if its IMDB don't believe it, they also said that filming on the new friday the 13th began in april and would be rated G, then they said it would be a continuation of part 3, now they're back to no info on it at all. HAlloween 9 they said would be about john tate being stalked by michael, thn they said it would be the missing years deal, which turned out to be a fan script, this was recently debunked by www.halloweenmovies.com. moral of the story, dont believe anything on IMDB until someone closely involved with the film confirms it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 AM.