|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#21
09-26-2005, 07:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
it might be ok i would see it anyway since i am a huge jason fan. but i prob wouldnt like it as much as the first one. i think the should bring in hellraiser or the wishmaker. that would kickass
__________________
Fridays 
|
|
#22
10-06-2005, 06:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Therein lies the problem - pay to see these "versus" and remake things (yes, even out of curiousity...), they make money and make more of them. The fate of modern horror cinema is in your hands! :cool:
__________________
|
|
#23
10-06-2005, 08:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In actuality, everyone knows they will see this sequel if it were F v. J or F v. J v. M. It is the sheer fact that three of the most villaness creatures ever created in the horror genre are all gonna be on the silver screen together. Either way, I will gladly see it and then critique it after it is all said and done. Who knows...It may be of oscar calibur (LOL---LOL)...Anyways, judge not unless you write a opinonated movie column.
SAUXVAGE
__________________
Blood in, Blood out---Bound by honor.
|
 |
|
|
