|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#23
02-18-2005, 06:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......
chocolate.  LOL! SLOTH!
__________________
 
|
|
#26
02-22-2005, 05:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#27
02-23-2005, 05:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
OH NO!!!! not a spider monkey!! NO!! they are so cute!!! DAMMIT!!:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
__________________
|
|
#28
03-01-2005, 12:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Star Wars was actually shot in space urgeok, but it was a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.
If you begin removing the harsher elements from extremely harsh films, they begin to lose their edge - as someone pointed out above, the undeniably genuine animal killings in Cannibal Holocaust serve to make the casual viewer ponder on the human "deaths" and, together with the real third-world execution footage (deliberately misleadingly described as "fake" in the movie itself), the whole package comes with a punch that makes this film powerful, demanding and unforgettable... whatever your views on its importance in cinematic history, and animal rights. Does it really matter about how traditionally cute your slaughtered animals are, mothman/aborted? Is the killing of the (edible?) pig worse than the slicing open of the live, screaming muskrat, or the stabbing and shell-peeling of the giant turtle?
|
|
#29
03-01-2005, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The best 3 are: "Cannibal Holocaust" "Jungle Holocaust" "Cannobal Apocalypse" "Ferox" is okay (mostly down to the location shooting, the score and John Morghen's balls-out performance) but is far to slow in bringing in the cannibals, is too padded with New York footage and has some poor FX (like the awful dick chopping scene), that are filmed full on in bright light to show just how much they look like latex. Something Deodato was wise enough not to do and as such the deaths in "Can Holo" are much more disturbing. And when it comes to full on, close up gore he betters Lenzi as well, as the butchery sequence in "Jungle Holocaust" is up close but looks 100 times better than anything in "Ferox". So good in fact Lenzi stole it for his "Eaten Alive".
|
|
#30
03-01-2005, 01:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Mike's dick-slicing gets far more of a reaction in my house than the equivalent in Holocaust and any of the others - if you really want to get anal (with a severed cock? Snigger!) about it, I would put this down to [a] the tight editing of the sequence [b] that sublime "slapping-back" latex attachment and [c] the lack of daft bloodied-stump as in on show in Holocaust (not to mention the rather inappropriate looking stone-knife the cannibal uses in Deodato's film, and oddly greyish skin tone of the unfortunate member). Why do I find myself talking about penises so much in this forum?
|
 |
|
|
