"Hallow's End" was terrible!!

[thEsounDofdirT]

hell no.. halloween 3 was a croch the way it deviated from the series... i guess they figured halloween 1 and 2 were like the same night... so they could just pick different halloween nights an dhave it associate with the actually time of year.. rather than michael myers... bastards.. fucking bastards

[Stingy Jack]

Originally posted by thEsounDofdirT
hell no.. halloween 3 was a croch the way it deviated from the series... i guess they figured halloween 1 and 2 were like the same night... so they could just pick different halloween nights an dhave it associate with the actually time of year.. rather than michael myers... bastards.. fucking bastards

I think the main reason that film was so terrible is simply because it is part of the series. As a stand-alone story it's really not all that bad. Well, it's not good either.

[KRUGERKID13]

Originally posted by Stingy Jack
As you can probably tell from my ID, I'm a huge fan of Halloween. So, I was relatively excited when I saw the movie "Hallow's End" for rent at the local video store. The cover art was impressive, and the blurb on the back of the box made me believe the film was right up my alley.

WARNING!!

Movies on the shelf with great cover art have great cover art to lure unsuspecting dolts like myself to rent a turd.

The movie was a complete waste of time . . . although, I really didn't have much better to do. But that's beside the point, dammit!

For every 15 horror movies released, in my experience, 2 might be entertaining enough to sit through. Is it just me, or does it seem that many horror producers take fans of the genre to be mindless drones, who grin a drool-filled grin whenever a bit of a gore is splattered on the screen? I want a film that's smart, scary, and makes me feel as if I've experienced something worthwhile.

Is it just me?

Jack

yeah thats what happened with me when i bought blood moon (worst piece of crap i ever bought)