|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#12
03-09-2004, 02:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
whoever the hell Crooked I is, it's only one person
|
|
#14
03-10-2004, 12:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
7: It stands for seven, a number greater than one. Example:
* * * * * * * That's 7 (seven) stars. 1: It stands for one. It's less than seven. * That's 1 (one) star. Notice the difference? Now, let's re-read the title of the thread: "Top 7 Lyricist of All Time" Notice how it's 7 (seven) and not 1 (one). Understand now?
|
|
#15
03-10-2004, 05:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
FRIDAYTHE13THFANS HOMETOWN BUDDY WICKED LADYS BUDDY Human passions have mysterious ways, in children as well as grown-ups. Those affected by them can't explain them, and those who haven't known them have no understanding of them at all. -neverending story (the book)
|
|
#16
03-10-2004, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Trent Reznor
Brad Nowell Gavin Rossdale Eminem Dr Dre
|
|
#17
03-10-2004, 06:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
come on, two more, you can do it
|
|
#18
03-11-2004, 12:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Let’s all thank Sam the Egg for compiling a complete list of seven hackneyed run-of-the-mill dipshits (excluding a couple). Congratulations Mr. Eggspert: you can count! Yes I understand that the thread title asks for seven of them – a Cocker Spaniel with a sucking chest wound could have devised as much. I also understand that the author of the thread failed to use the plural form of the word lyricist when requesting that we indicate seven of them. Furthermore, we are asked to list seven of the “top” lyricists. The problem here is that “top” is not a quantitative word – that is to say, someone or something that occupies the position of top does not do so in varying degrees. By this “list seven of the top” logic it would be reasonable to conclude that anybody who is not the worst could be considered one of the “top” lyricists of all time, and I don’t go for that shit. If someone is the best, they cannot be “one of the best,” they are, quite simply, THE best. And so it is not the case that anyone has failed to understand the objective of the original question, but that the question itself is, in fact, a flawed one, and so I have chosen to answer it in a reasonable manner. Next time spare us the pointless attempt at self-important clarification. Nobody cares. Last edited by SoulEater; 03-11-2004 at 12:20 PM.
|
|
#19
03-11-2004, 12:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're still not answering the question. The question asks for seven. If you're not going to answer it right, then don't bother answering it at all. Giving one, or five, when they ask for seven makes you look like an idiot who can't count
Last edited by Sam The Egg; 03-11-2004 at 12:52 PM.
|
 |
|
|
