Futureweapons

[Despare]

Neat video. I see the comments about developing anti-pollution technology instead and I think we've heard similar stuff here but that's just so idealistic. We will always be attacked and there will always be war. That's how human beings are. It doesn't matter how clean the air is, people will always be out to kill each other.

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

Originally Posted by Despare

These "shanties" are often solid brick/block buildings with a few small windows that enemy snipers can fire out of taking out the guys who have no cover with ease.

Bricks?! We better come up with something that can drop 100 nuclear bombs a minute then.

[Vodstok]

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X

Bricks?! We better build something that can drop 100 nuclear bombs a second then!

What do you mean "we", Canadian? ;)

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

Originally Posted by Vodstok

What do you mean "we", Canadian? ;)

Oh it's not we anymore. america? It only "we" when you need our troops huh? Fine! go fuck yourselves.

[Despare]

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X

Bricks?! We better come up with something that can drop 100 nuclear bombs a minute then.

No but we need to come up with something that can take out a sniper before he puts a bullet through the heads of five soldiers. You act as if we should never have a casualty.

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

Originally Posted by Despare

No but we need to come up with something that can take out a sniper before he puts a bullet through the heads of five soldiers. You act as if we should never have a casualty.

and you don't think they already have stuff more than capable of taking out a brick building? They've only had apache helicopters since like viet nam... I'm just saying the money/research could be better spent elsewhere. The most important thing actually isn't blowing up brick buildings in iraq.

[Despare]

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X

and you don't think they already have stuff more than capable of taking out a brick building?

They do, but not in the same way. The SMAW drops the building and it can't be fortified again and reoccupied. Of course there are stronger weapons but sometimes you need more accuracy and less force. Hopefully it would cut back the civillian death toll.

[X¤MurderDoll¤X]

Originally Posted by Despare

They do, but not in the same way. The SMAW drops the building and it can't be fortified again and reoccupied. Of course there are stronger weapons but sometimes you need more accuracy and less force. Hopefully it would cut back the civillian death toll.

name me a weapon that the US used to use and then upgraded to something with less force.

with links plz

I'm not a hippy, yeah we need to kill people war is hell people die blah blah blah I'm saying AGAIN that the money/research is mismanaged in the US. I don't think anyone in the world would argue about the money mismanagement thing, anyone with half a brain anyway. ;)

[Vodstok]

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X

Oh it's not we anymore. america? It only "we" when you need our troops huh? Fine! go fuck yourselves.

At least we're clear on where we stand :)


Actually, if political negotiations between countries were this straight forward, there probably wouldnt be any wars :D

[Vodstok]

this demo reminds me of the commercials in Starship troopers. it would be funny if they were kidding:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RdxB...elated&search=