Go Back   Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. > Horror Movie Discussion > Classic Horror Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 03-09-2006, 04:15 AM
zomb5150 zomb5150 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: -------------------------------------------
Posts: 1,783
Quote:
Originally posted by Jigsaw's Girl
Over all I liked the second one better, but the only thing that I didn't like was that you never found all of the peoples tapes in the house. Otherwise I thought it was better than the first, you got to know Jigsaw more and I LOVE THE ENDING! *evil grin*
There were alot of people in the House, alot were there for the same reason...finding all the tapes would have made the movie longer, boring and less realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-15-2006, 10:22 PM
hello,danny hello,danny is offline
Hellraiser
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 25
Re: Re: saw 2

Quote:
Originally posted by slasherman
..it wasnt better ...period !
Yeah, I agree. I can't believe the rest of you liked SAW 2. . .actually, the first SAW film is terribly overrated. I mean, I suppose it did have a sort of old-school, William Castle-esque charm (cheese, empty performances, silly gags and all), and the ending was kind of neat. . .

. . .but then comes SAW 2. I disliked this movie intensely. I almost didn't finish it, it was THAT BAD. MY GOD! Even Beverly Mitchell was a let-down--she had like. . .TEN words to say THE WHOLE film--all of her time on screen was devoted to covering her ears and gaping at the horror of it all.

The REAL horror is this movie. I'm sick of these ADD-inspired horror films--like, I know we're the MTV generation and all, but can we please bring back a sense of restraint and pacing, instead of these God-awful one-note orgies of fast editing and shock?

Horror movies today just don't stay with you like THE SHINING (its pace was ten times slower than either of the SAW films, and yet it's fifty-gagillion times scarier!) Look at Roman Polanski's REPULSION--SLOW!--but TERRIBLY scary!

I'm not trying to say that fast editing can't be scary, I'm just saying it's not working here. And it CERTAINLY doesn't help SAW 2--but then, what could?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-16-2006, 05:38 PM
Dismal's Avatar
Dismal Dismal is offline
Scares Little Kids
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: N E W Jers
Posts: 21
Send a message via AIM to Dismal
I really enjoyed both movies, there about even.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-17-2006, 04:29 AM
kung-fu-jesus's Avatar
kung-fu-jesus kung-fu-jesus is offline
new owner of hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: hell, under new managment
Posts: 781
both good. tie for me. better deaths in 2 though.
__________________
you lied to me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-17-2006, 08:41 AM
1beastieibe's Avatar
1beastieibe 1beastieibe is offline
Boyband Junkie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: in a van down by the river
Posts: 341
Send a message via AIM to 1beastieibe
I liked Saw 2 but definatly like the 1st one better. It was more original and I liked trying to guess what was going on, and then being totally thrown off at the end was nice. The second one I already knew what was going to happen,and I wish we got to know more about the characters and their past.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM.