|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#91
11-02-2004, 10:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
p.s i think md is a whacko myself, or this that whacker? looking at the pics he posted it's probably both. i should do more proof reading before posting 
|
|
#92
11-02-2004, 10:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
all this stuff is crazy
cant we all just get along?
__________________
|
|
#93
11-02-2004, 10:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If things anoy people that much, dont bother reading it..... I just ignore it and just chuckle.
|
|
#94
11-02-2004, 10:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
btw a lot of those so called men who say they were only "joking around" are either lying or are in the early stages of becoming a full blown pedophile. as most pedophiles will claim that they did what they did out of love or that it was "only a bit of fun" the girl/boy didn't mind. or it could be that it was like isaid earlier and he has one fucked up sence of humour.. i truley hope its the latter.
|
|
#95
11-03-2004, 01:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well well...what a surprise...WU has something to say.
Obviously you hadn't noticed, but the issue was resolved, WITHOUT your input. I never said MD DIDN'T have a fucked up sense of humour, as a matter of fact, I've more or less said exactly that...had you actually read a little more of that which you are involving yourself in and commenting on, you'd realise this. IF he was indeed serious in what he was allegedly saying, I don't condone it whatsoever. Yes, it DOES annoy me when issues like this between two or more people aren't resolved, and I feel it's rightly so. I don't want to have to see it spilling into every thread that the individuals post in, because I post here too. I don't want to have to BOTHER avoiding it by not reading it...nor should I have to...Seeing these things continue, to me, is like having somebody follow me around clapping - irritating. If you're not personally irritatted by this, then it's about YOU, not me...knowing how much you love to indulge in constant shit-stirring among the members here, this doesn't come as much of a surprise to me. You wanna call me a "nerd" for having issue with this kinda shit? That's again indicative of your general bullshit...so if I don't personally agree with something you're ok with, I'm a nerd? Pretty poor attempt at both a loophole, and at an insult, jackass. If you want to get more of a rise out of me, which is clearly what you're after, I'm afraid you'll have to come up with something a little more potent than stale vinegar...something I've NEVER seen you do. You're just an annoying KID, wu. Most everyone here knows it. Any further attempts by you to bring up this issue, or to involve yourself in my (already resolved) issues, will be ignored. I value you, and your input about as much as that of the local drunk - Occasionally slightly funny, but for all the wrong reasons.:rolleyes:
|
|
#96
11-03-2004, 02:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
"If you want to get more of a rise out of me, which is clearly what you're after, I'm afraid you'll have to come up with something a little more potent than stale vinegar...something I've NEVER seen you do. "
It seems that he's gotten all the rise out of you that he needs .. God what a whine ... Apparently this shaft of golden light is the only one here who's allowed to have an opinion. Maybe people find your so called attempts at 3rd party intervention to be as irritating as you claim to find the rest of the posts to be. For someone who's 'finished' with everyone with an opposing view to yours you sure are in a hurry to come back time and time again. Obviously you live to argue just like everyone else so quit with your own brand of bullshit - the high and mighty do-gooder attitude is an obvious complete sham. And the name calling ...its a pretty feeble way to try to get a failing point across.
|
|
#97
11-03-2004, 03:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So...he's got a rise out of me? Do I seem like I'm about to "lose it" or something? NO.
I don't live for arguing, I just have no problem whatsoever telling a person IF and when they're wrong, or if their "opinions" are unfounded, and/or I think they're full of shit. My comments about WU (which seem to be your latest problem with me) are not "unfair" or incorrect. Spend a little more time here and I assure you that you'll understand, and maybe even agree - don't worry, you don't have to TELL me when you come to this realisation, I know you never would. If people have a legitimate issue with me, they're free to bring it to my attention. Provided they don't come across as condescending (like you) and act as though their opinion invalidates mine, there shouldn't be a problem. Unfortunately, this is unlikely to happen considering all you seem to be interested in is drawing this out for as long as you can. A person is entitled to defend themselves, that alone explains my replies. As long as I have issue with what you're saying, I'll let you know, most likely in a more polite and rational manner than you seem willing to afford me. As for name calling...I will do so when I feel necessary, however, perhaps you should take a look around most ANY forum, or, hell...even out there in the "real world", and I'm sure you'll find my "name calling" to be tame at most...if you're really that offended by it, I'll be certain to make any future posts towards you as PG13 as you'd like them to be, as for a failing point, that's a matter of perspective. You don't like my "intervention"...that's ok, just like it's alright for me to simply not give a fuck that you don't, and maintain that I dislike people arguing. If there's anything about that to consider a "sham" in your opinion, so be it...I'm not about to attempt to understand YOUR "own brand of bullshit" as you would put it. Here's where you jump in again and say "but you're arguing too"...right? Allow me to tell you in advance tht this isn't an argument, this is me conducting myself in a rational manner, as per usual, attempting to discuss an issue in a mature way, regardless of how immature the responses, it may be an argument on YOUR side, but I don't consider it to be an argument on mine. You're routine of consistant attempts to try and make ME look like the bad guy is what appears "transparent", I had NO issue with you whatsoever before you jumped in for no reason, any person of moderate intelligence will quickly realise this. If you think I'll just accept the things you say when you're wrong, you ought to be speaking to somebody else. Somebody a little more submissive, eg: NOT me. If you're saying I should just "end" this, then consider it ended, just know that if you make incorrect, innapropriote or unduly hostile statements towards me, you only serve to prove my point, which I will be more than happy to indicate to you if and when necessary.
|
|
#98
11-03-2004, 03:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
this still draggin on........................
|
|
#99
11-03-2004, 05:24 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
"If people have a legitimate issue with me, they're free to bring it to my attention. Provided they don't come across as condescending (like you) "
at this point i stopped reading. absolutely no credibility whatsoever. should i also cut and paste the line 'i'm done with you ?' as well ? man what a windbag .. cant even walk his own talk. and Shanks .. if it gets dragged on it wont be by me .. i'm finished with this thread .. its a bore ... How do you reason with a hypocrite who calls you condescending ... while they are being condescending ? Who willingly participates in fights while telling people not to fight. (once you start name calling .. you're fighting ... thats what my 4 year old understands ... apparently this guy cant see anything past his misaimed self righteousness ...
|
|
#100
11-03-2004, 07:56 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you'll do me the courtesy of actually READING this post, I'll TRY to make it so you understand point I'm trying to make, if not, I give up...knowing that it is YOU that cannot be reasoned with.
You can cut and paste anything that you feel will back up your "case", however...I'll tell you now, I never said that I was done with YOU. How am I being condescending? I just came in here attempting to be reasonable, and as civil towards you as possible in order to end whatever this problem you seem to have with me is, and what happened? You ignored my post, and replied with hostility. In regards to your "definition" of an argument, I'll also point out that from the point I'd resolved what had went on between myself and FK, that there has been no namecalling towards you whatsoever in any of my posts, again - something I cannot say for you. So what are you saying, that I'm talking and you're arguing? Considering the abovementioned factors, I can't help but think that when you referr to me as a hypocrite, or "the guy that cant see anything past his misaimed self righteousness", perhaps you should be a little more self analytical, and realise that indeed YOU are the one that's clearly not "over" this. Now you can go on calling me transparent, a "sham", throw as many names at me, or give as many incorrect assessments of my character as you like. I know that for my part, I've attempted to end that which you started in a civil manner - something I hope that you'll eventually be capable of reciprocating. If not, I'm happy with the outcome either way, as any continuation of this unnecessary hostility on your part will only reflect badly on YOU. So, are we done with this shit?
|
 |
|
|
