|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Version Did You Like Better- The Shining With Jack Nickleson or The Remake? | |||
| The Shining With Jack Nickelson. |
   
|
6 | 60.00% |
| Remake Version. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I Cannot Decide. |
  
|
4 | 40.00% |
| Did Not Like Either One. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools
|
|
#2
04-10-2004, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even tho the second one stayed closer to the book, I like the first one because no one can replace Jacky-boy
|
|
#3
04-10-2004, 02:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
04-10-2004, 03:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jack Nicholson's performance in Stanley Kubrick's theatrical rendition of "The Shining" MADE the movie....However....Stephen King's disappointment in Kubrick's interpretation, stemmed from the fact that Kubrick strayed too far from the original story and left out the entire "boiler" drama....King always adds extra elements to create additional tension to the main point of the story....ie:Cujo...The dog was bad enough, but King added the heat, suffocation, and the element of being trapped in the car, along with the fact that the boy was asthmatic, to add extra tension...King likes to say, "If this doesn't kill you, here's something else that will"...There is evidence of this in EVERY one of King's novels...Kubrick downplayed that aspect, King remade the movie in order to put it back in, and bring it closer to his book
__________________
...  If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance...Baffle 'em with bullshit My Karma ran over my Dogma God WAS my co-pilot...But, we crashed in the mountains and...I had to eat him I'm suffocating in what's become of me... The rancid remains of what I used to be
|
|
#6
04-10-2004, 05:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 Idle hands may be the Devils work, but idle minds you see, are so much worse.....
|
|
#7
04-10-2004, 05:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, thank you, sexy beast of hair! Jack rocks, everyone knows that ( or should). Who else can play an insane person believably?!
__________________
Idle hands may be the Devils work, but idle minds you see, are so much worse.....
|
|
#8
04-10-2004, 05:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe I did, sorry. I meant hairy sex beast....but, u r sexy, so.....:o :D
__________________
Idle hands may be the Devils work, but idle minds you see, are so much worse.....
|
|
#9
04-10-2004, 06:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Any time, MD. Any time:D ;)
__________________
Idle hands may be the Devils work, but idle minds you see, are so much worse.....
|
|
#10
04-10-2004, 06:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ooops! Turned the little pop-up window off, and didn't know I had any!! Sorry! I'm on it
__________________
Idle hands may be the Devils work, but idle minds you see, are so much worse.....
|
|
|
|
