|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
#1
09-09-2005, 03:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Englund wants Freddy Vs. Jason Vs. Michael Myers?
In the forum on http://nightmareonelmstreetfilms.com (subscription required):
Robert Englund's Own Pitch for Freddy Vs. Jason 2: If he can get the studio behind him, Robert Englund is pushing the Freddy Vs. Jason Vs. Michael Myers angle. "I have a pitch, I have an idea but we'd have to go a little retro and I'd have to have a couple of drinks with Jamie Lee Curtis, or at least make her eat some raw fish. But I do have a great idea and it's been pitched around a little bit which would be Freddy Vs. Jason Vs. Michael Myers, but I'd need to talk to them. But that's where that stands now."
__________________
I command by the power of Christ and the Gospel for this evil spirit that is inside this man or woman to come forward now and to face the judgment of God. 
|
|
#2
09-10-2005, 11:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yea, that'd be fucking rediculous. Michael Myers is a REAL mass murderer. Jason and Freddy aren't real. Jason is "dead" half the time, and he has no face. Freddy is in the dream world. Michael Myers is a real guy, and since the halloween series is so fucked up right now, adding Jason and Freddy to the series would only screw things up more. What we need is a solid Halloween 9 story line that connect all the movies back together.
__________________
:D
|
|
#3
09-10-2005, 11:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
  
|
|
#4
09-10-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
09-11-2005, 03:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thinks its a horrible idea. I liked FvJ because it was somthing new, but I think one was enough.
|
|
#6
09-11-2005, 07:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No. Just no. If it was made, I'm sure it would be a miserable failure. The styles of those three series are just too different for it to work.
__________________
And no matter what I say I cannot resist or betray it. No one could do so because there is no one here. There is only this body, this shadow, this darkness.
|
|
#7
09-11-2005, 12:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is a completely ridiculous idea. But personally, I thought Freddy Vs Jason was a ridiculous idea (and seeing the movie didn't exactly change my mind). Let them all die I say, but I guess there wouldn't be much money in that.:D
|
|
#8
09-11-2005, 12:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It'd turn out the same as FvsJ, probably:
-Completly mess up the continuity of the 3 franchises [Yikes...Halloween with more continuity screw ups *shudder*] -Have no actual winner -Leave it open for a sequel [FvsJvsMvsPinhead? ...vsAsh? ...vsChucky? ...vsWhatever will piss the most horror fans and make lots of money?] - Overall, it'd turn out as a fun but stupid horror movie with very few redeeming features. Meh, if they make it Ill watch it.
__________________
"There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness." - Friedrich Nietzsche
|
|
#9
09-11-2005, 07:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Robert Englund must be bankrupt.
Seriously, I mean Freddy is the only thing he can actually make some serious cash off of. Then he does all those B-movie giant snake flicks, I don't blame the guy for tryin' to keep his character alive.
__________________
MISINTUPITATED- The act of removing the spine by use of fire. DEVESTED- The removal of one's vest. SCTUPP- To deficate on a woman after nonconsensual sex.
|
|
#10
09-12-2005, 11:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't get it, Englund usually seems like a really smart guy...
If he's so damn anxious to put the glove back on, why not push for a new Nightmare movie? Screw Jason and Michael. Make Freddy dark and scary again... I did kinda like the Elm Street prequel idea, but I still think a Freddy-only Nightmare movie is the way to go. There hasn't been a sequel in over a decade, both Jason and Michael have had a couple chances since then and bombed...
|
 |
|
|
