
11-18-2014, 07:19 PM
|
 |
Evil Sweat
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,360
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by horcrux2007
What didn't you like about it?
|
I'll put it in white to avoid spoiling it for others:
- I think I was expecting something different.
The archaeology approach was cool. But I didn't like the way magic and Hell were used in the concept.
That and some stuff didn't make sense to me or was too vague for my taste:
-They take the safe route in the beginning, the way Papillion had taken before and still things go wrong so they have to take the evil passage.
-They didn't seem that surprised when The Mole, a guy who's been missing for two years, suddenly turns up. He says he knows the way out but for some reason he still there.
-Who was the person who appeared and disappeared during the guided tour?
-What was the deal with the hooded guy? Was he the creator of the stone?
-Who was the woman who left the dancing and who was also the priestess?
The creator's wife?
I think it would've been better for this movie if they used creatures, made and controlled by the alchemist who lives and dwells in the catacombs.
Until the one who solves the riddle comes to claim the stone.
Kind of a horror Indiana Jones on a smaller scale.
The wife being someone who lures victims to the tunnels to feed the creatures or something like that.-
__________________
|