[metternich1815]

I just want to comment on Curse of Frankenstein, which was a topic of discussion in this thread earlier. I had already discussed it previously, but I just want to say it is my second favorite Frankenstein adaptation after Frankenstein (1931). The characters appeared appropriately complex and it is fascinating to observe the deterioration of the relationship of Dr. Frankenstein and his friend Paul, as well as Dr. Frankenstein more broadly. The thing with Dr. Frankenstein is that he is definitely an immoral character, but it is far from black and white. He really does feel he is doing good and that he will be vindicated. At the same time, he does many horrendous things. There is a certain tragic element to his character. Sadly, the sequels do sort of undo the greatness of the ending, but they are still good nonetheless. The film also includes some really good effects and is in color, a trademark of Hammer films of the period. As alluded to earlier, there are some tremendous performances in this film. Peter Cushing was particularly excellent, but there really are many shining performances. The person who played Paul delivered a good performance as well. Christopher Lee was interesting as the monster, a role he played very differently than the 31 original. The role did not allow him the room to act as later films like Horror of Dracula will, but he still did really well within the confines of his character. Definitely frightening even by today's standards. There really is much more, but that is a good summary of many of the things I enjoyed. In my honest opinion, the film has held up remarkably well and is easily my favorite of the Hammer films. As a historical note, this is the first major Hammer film which re-adapted the films made by Universal Studios.