Quote:
Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ
Its a pointless remake that more people will end up watching than the original was what I was getting at. It's inferior because it was a rehash with less convincing actors... Michael Pitt sucked.
|
Why were they less convincing?
People watching a foreign film who do not speak the language the film was shot in, often misinterpret the acting because they're not getting all the nuances of the speech. This sometimes leads to folks believing a performance is better than it is.
I also love the fact that you're convinced it's a pointless remake even though the writer and director felt otherwise.
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: