|
What exactly propels a flick into the "overrated" radar actually?
I mean, High Tension has a really cock-eyed and ridiculous climax (or anti-climax, whichever you prefer), but still people rate it pretty highly as a "more than decent" horror flick of recent times.
Do you take the overall movie into this purview, or just aspects of it - like
A) a very sore anti-climactic ending,
B) story and plotline,
C) cheese factor,
D) repeat viewing value...?
Is there a line which you have drawn somewhere for your decision?
(Still cannot see how some of you didnt dig Jaws at all...)
__________________
"If you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
|