[urgeok2]

This isn't a CGI vs non CGI effects debate ..

it's something i got thinking about because of a couple of comments in another thread.

Someone mentioned bad CGI.

What do folks consider bad CGI vs good CGI.

what are examples of it done poorly ???

One example I can think of is in the otherwise excellent Blade II
when for a brief second there were a couple of vampire ninjas flipping around. it didnt look natural .. the figures were stretched out and plastic looking.


good CGI - the Jurrasic Park movies, 10,000 BC (not a great movie but the effects were pretty awsome), King Kong.


when people say 'bad CGI' i'm curious to hear why they say it was bad specifically (and not the 'they shouldn't have used CGI at all" arguement - thats for another thread)