[Psycom5k]

Originally Posted by bloodrayne

No, I'm pretty sure that means that people are USUALLY more familiar with the movies, actors and actresses of their OWN generations...And many younger people haven't seen or even heard of a lot of the movies that the older actors have been in, so it's natural to go with what you know...Everyone IS entitled to their own opinion (no one has said otherwise), but it's kinda difficult to FORM an opinion about something you're not familiar with

Umm...Actually...This last time, my vote for Campbell would NOT have mattered, because he lost by more than 1 vote, MY vote wouldn't have even TIED it...And the time before that, I SAID that my vote wouldn't have mattered because he won by a large majority, so my vote WOULD NOT HAVE MATTERED...Thus, proving MY point, TWICE...See how I can do that without childish name calling?

Although this is certainly a matter of opinion, it leads me to wonder if you have seen Galaxy Of Terror, Tobe Hooper's Dance Of The Dead, 2001 Maniacs, Strangeland, Wishmaster, Urban Legends, Eaten Alive, Night Terrors, Mangler and a few more that I know I'm forgetting to mention...Whether the movies were good or not, Englund's performances were infallible (although he WAS a bit over the top in 2001 Maniacs, but that whole thing was cheesy as hell, so...)...Anyway, if NOT then I'd call this an example of Neverending's point...

I see your point on the voting thing and appologize, but, I have seen most of those movies englund was in (except galaxy of terror), I just don't think that he did a good job in any of them. I also forgot to note that it was my opinion that he wasn't good in anything else. I was going on about opinions and totally forgot to note mine, which made me feel like an idiot. But hey, that happens. Anyways, yeah so i guess i was wrong and apologies all around to whoever this effects.


uhhh..... snoochie boochies.