Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodrayne
LOL...I was waiting for you to come out with this ;)
I really can't explain it to you any better than I tried to before...The best that I could come up with was the fact that my kids know the violence, blood, guts, death, etcetera is all fake...They even know exactly how it's done, and often critique the effects if they feel that they could have been done a better or different way...The nudity, however is real...
And...the sex parts are just boring for me...and NOT what I paid to watch...
"If I watch a horror movie...I wanna see HORROR...If I wanna watch people have sex, I'll get a porno"...and my other worn out quote..."I have never been scared by a tit or an ass in my entire life, and I doubt that I ever will"
I KNOW that doesn't make sense to you...But, honestly that's about the best I've got
|
well, i think your analogy breaks down here .. your posts suggests that horror is ok because it's fake, and nudity (which you keep curiously equating with sex - is real) but porno (which i never mentioned - just nudity) is ok if it's a porno you want.
the question i'm curious about - is why do you think nudity (not porn which is people graphically having sex - something you rarely ever see in a horror) is more innapropriate than gore - fake or not ?
thats the part i cant understand ...
personally - I think north american sex senes ARE boring as hell.. its about as appealing as cleaning fish.
i love the way europeans are completely aware that its a natural part of being human... and they celebrate it.