Quote:
Originally posted by PR3SSUR3
Everything, perhaps, but if you consider 'agnostics' do not specifically practice anything (unlike atheists, who are thought active in the disbelief in God) yet are labelled so because of their non-recognition or denial of the concept of the supernatural forces, it seems an unnecessary action to need to call them something. You may as well make up a word for someone who is impartial or undecided on milk, or lamb steak.
|
lmfao at impartial to lamb steak. :p
Actually I do agree with you, it is unnecessary.
(I love how you can just edit posts on the internet if you take offense to something and then seconds later realize your misunderstanding.)