Quote:
Originally posted by PR3SSUR3
Now, are you angry because you cannot accept your mutated lack of penis?
;)
|
These are the things that I'm gleaning from your last statement:
1. You obliviously don't believe in orgasms either, considering that you've probably never had one.
2. ...And let's just lay it on the table here... You're upset that I'm infinitely more educated, smarter, and more articulate than you are. What makes this even more difficult for you to swallow is the fact that I am a woman.
3. You are a violating asshole. I did not invite you nor made any references or jokes of my own regarding my womanhood, and thus you have no cause to do so either.
I realize that you're trying to piss me off, because that is what people who try to argue with no basis in fact do when they are threatened by the more intelligent members of the conversations. However, that comment went way too far. Way too far. I'd love to threaten you with, "You'd better not ever say something like that to me again," but I realize that this is an internet forum.
By the way, those people who claim that the Second Vatican Council supported the abuse of young boys or advocated it are idiots of the worst kind. The Second Vatican Council convened to discuss world poverty and the digeneration of compassion and kindness. They tried to set about plans for the Catholic Church to reach out to the world in charity. They addressed the ideas behind what is known as "Liberation Theology." Also, there were others present at the Council besides the "inner circle" of the papacy. John Paul was Pope at the time, and he was one of the best Popes the world had seen in centuries. His predecessor, John Paul II tried to follow in his foot steps. (However
his predecessor is a schmuck).