|
you act as though there are no non-religious assholes. You keep bringing in the actions of a portion (maybe the majority, maybe not) of the followers of certain religions as an indication of the religion its self. That is just faulty logic.
And I'm not going to argue the whole existence/nonexistence thing. Not because I agree, I don't, but because there is no evidence to support either side. I will simply say that lack of proof is not proof of a lack and then I shall leave it be and suggest that we not make the discussion so petty in the future.
|