Quote:
|
Originally posted by alkytrio666 the "kid gang" was flat out dumb,
|
I kinda liked them. I mean, imagine, a gang of children you can sic on everyone that pisses you off with only a bag of bubble gum. Thinking over the possibilites makes me light-headed with glee. :-P
Quote:
Originally posted by alkytrio666 the first half was horrible--and it wasn't even an "almost-porno" like others have claimed! It was a lot of tits. Whoopty-fuckin'-doo. It would be better, if you want the things this movie supposably had, to watch a porno, followed by Cannibal Holocaust.
At least Wolf Creek had good acting/dialogue and it never claimed to be something it wasn't. [/B]
|
I still disagree on Wolf Creek having any good acting or dialogue. It seemed more to me like a really boring Australian version of MTV's "The Real World"...I mean, half the movie was the two girls talking about the guy and who he liked, blah-di-blah. This was why I greatly enjoyed their deaths. But, to each their own, I always say.
I agree with Hostel not living up to its promises, but I thought that was only because I am a bit jaded when it comes to gore. I always want more, more, more. *LOL* But, Greg Nicotero's effects made the movie worth it, for me. Oh, how I love that man... *sigh* And, Cannibal Holocaust, you say? I'm dying to see that (no pun intended, I swear!). It's next on my list.