Thread: CGI Isn't Scary
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 01-26-2006, 12:03 PM
ItsAlive75's Avatar
ItsAlive75 ItsAlive75 is offline
Image of the Invisible
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 6,357
Send a message via AIM to ItsAlive75
no muller made a great point. The CGI in a film is only going to be as good as the filmmakers want to make it. But it also has a lot to do with the audience the film is geared towards. Flicks like "Anaconda" and "The Mummy" are aimed more towards younger audiences than anything else. Young teenagers (for the most part) just want the cool action scenes and don't pay much attention to the quality of the CGI (Boogeyman is a good example).

One director who's taken quite a liking to CGI that I personally dispprove of is Steven Speilberg. Minority Report and War of the Worlds relied almost entirely on CGI, and both of those movies are pretty terrible. With Munich he was more focused on telling a story well, and the CGI effects are minimal to none.
__________________
MISINTUPITATED- The act of removing the spine by use of fire.

DEVESTED- The removal of one's vest.

SCTUPP- To deficate on a woman after nonconsensual sex.
Reply With Quote