Quote:
Originally posted by Misanthrope
Shit movie!
Boring, and theres no interessting story.
Abruptly the movie ends.
Dawn of the dead, the first strike is much better!!!
My joy was premature. :(
|
It wasn't a shit movie. It was one of the best horror movies to come out this year. I liked this movie alot, but I don't think this is Romero worthy. For HIM to direct this movie makes it bad, because he had so much more potential than this. I would have been happy with this movie if it was directed by someone else. I just think that if Romero wasn't trying to please everyone, and went back to just making movies for his fans this movie would have kicked ass. Why make the R-Rating? He should of fought for unrated. I know it was the production company that made it R, but when u really think about it, theirs no point. Anyone who wasn't a huge fan of the series didn't understand if it was a remake/sequel/ or original movie. So many thought it looked like shit. Only the true fans went to go see it. I saw it the day it came out and the theater only had about 8 people in it. You could tell they were die hard fans because they all recognized Tom Savani in it. And everyone stayed for the credits to make sure they didn't miss any cameos. This movie was supposed to be for the fans and it wasn't. I agree with you, Dawn of the Dead will always be the best in the series. I watched it today acutually. I never get sick of it, I probably watch it once every 2 months. But Land of the Dead wasn't a shit movie. It was still a prety decent film, it just didn't live up to its potential.