Quote:
Originally posted by BH14
I thought it was good but I never thought it was "orgasmically" good as Marroe said it was. It was close though. I think Ebert used the same word "orgasmically good" too in his review because he even gave it 3 stars and liked it. Even if some of you all hated the first one, you could still enjoy the second one. Who else seen this and what did you think of it?
|
Oh yes, that is the best description of Devil's Rejects "orgasmic"...but I didn't wanna think about Roger Ebert ever getting that feeling about a movie, or anything else.