|
I'm agreeing with both replies; though I've only seen the first one. In spite of the fact that it some of the most atrocious acting this side of north, the first movie kept me thoroughly entertained for a few reasons: excellent creature effects (for its time), acting that ranges from lackluster to downright hideous, and an excellent antagonist with a devious agenda.
I have yet to see the sequel -- sorry I couldn't give you a review rather than just speculating -- but $10 doesn't seem like a waste, no matter how bad it is.
|