View Single Post
  #13  
Old 03-01-2005, 09:49 AM
Prelude95Si's Avatar
Prelude95Si Prelude95Si is offline
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 651
I would agree that the director's cut for both ALIEN and ALIENS were better than the originals. I think that they both had sceens that would have better explained the charcters. For example, the part about Riply finding out that her daughter is died at the beginning of Aliens should have been kept b/c it would explain why Riply fell into a "mother" role with Nute. In Alien the part were Riply finds her crew cocconed would have been needed to better justify Aliens b/c with Alien the alien just killed people in the original cut, but in Aliens we learn that the aliens take the humans to be cocconed. But then again they ignored the whole coccon idea in Alien 3, everybody just died in that movie. Speaking of Alien 3, in the director's cut they should have kept the sceen were they show what a Queen facehugger looked like but then the audience would know that Riply had a queen in her so that would have destoried the movie for the perpose of suspense I guess.

T2 director's cut. Hmmmm...
I'm fine with the original cut.

Chronicals of Ridic.
Hated this movie, I hated Pitch Black so I knew that I would hate Ridic. And the version I first saw was the director's cut b/c I waited to rent it, that way I waste less money.
Reply With Quote