Quote:
Originally posted by EXTR3MIST
There's a lot of talk about seeking meaning and consistency in Fulci's films... but where does it stop?
If one scene is explained away and grudgingly accepted by detractors, they will inevitably pick fault with another.
It is a troublesome approach to indulging in 1970's/80's exploitation - if you are likely to praise, say, The Last House on the Left or I Spit on Your Grave for their "gritty realism", but are unable to accept The Beyond's world of fantastic scenarios and stretched logic then perhaps a really good drama with nasty bits is all you're after.
I think there are essentially two camps - those who don't like Fulci's refusal (or inability) to pander to his audience's logical expectations, and those who see this trait as a virtue and put it all down to wonderful over enthusiasm.
|
what are the audiences logical expectations ?
i have over 3 dozen films in the genre (italian splatter horror) and my only expectation is to be entertained.
I'm not a stickler for rules, or a linear story, or an involved plot, or coherency even - if i find the visuals interesting ..
again .. i had heard and read such hype about this film .. i was gung-ho to see it, warts and all .. i just didnt expect it to be so uneven and amateurish in its construction.
I simply sense no atmosphere of any kind.
even the 'shock scenes' were done in uninteresting ways.
Maybe if I'd seen this before a lot of other horror films I might think it was a lot cooler.
I'll watch it again .. i'm interested in hearing the commentary.