Quote:
Originally posted by FairyKorpes
That actually made my stomach turn. So tell me, what's the difference between this is a guy who looks at child porn? I mean how many people have been arrested for having it on their computers. You would think the "How To" on fucking a child would be illegal other then looking at pictures. Which i'm not condoning either, but one doesn't seem alright where the other isn't.
|
The loophole is that child pornography has a very clear definition, it is when the genitalia of said child are clearly and deliberately shown, or the child is performing sexual acts. Text shows nothing, and the literature in question actually isn't any kind of porn. It's like the difference between reading the Anarchist Cookbook and actually doing stuff from it.
But yeah, the NAMBLA members should take a couple shotgun blasts to the crotch.