View Single Post
  #17  
Old 12-16-2004, 08:33 AM
urgeok's Avatar
urgeok urgeok is offline
Banned

 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 19,465
Quote:
Originally posted by filmmaker2
I know that the "Dawn of the Dead" remake was a licensed property, and everyone who owned the original got their money, etc. And I also know that film is a commercial medium; it's an art form that exists primarily to make money for its investors. Technically it's not a "rip-off," but it does have vibrations of money-sucking evil about it.

Man, what an unnecessary, crassly commercial, and badly executed abomination it was (in my personal and deeply heartfelt opinion)! I mean, a lot of people liked it, and that's cool, I'm not dissing those good folks, but I personally was appalled.
man i thought the complete opposite. It looked like a labour of love to me.
No one make a zombie movie thinking it will be a critical success.. let alone the 'remake' of a cult favorite. I thought it was a huge risk, and like you - i'm not dissing the people who didnt like it ..
I just dont understand why some people didnt
Reply With Quote