Quote:
|
Guns will not become significantly harder to procure in the USA, regardless of any laws passed (which never have teeth, as congress knows who butters the bread).
|
How do you know this though?
I mean, it would be entirely new ground.
Quote:
|
Not only does the USA produce over 5 million guns a year, there are already more than 300 million guns in circulation.
|
Another comparison - but here, there was a paid hand-in. Yielded a lot of results.
But yeah either way agree with it or not, The second has been in place for a long damn time - I don't see it going anyplace. I just think that moves ought to be made to regulate things a little bit more.
Like really, there's no reason for a person to own a weapon that can rack up *that* high a headcount. It's not as though the US is at risk of a full scale military invasion . Right now, altering the specifics of the amendment would only really result in less life lost.
But hey, I agree - if there's that many weapons circulating legal and otherwise, if you're gonna own a gun, sure. Owning an arsenal or death machine? Just not really well advised.