Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBossInTheWall
What website? Why do you value its definition so much? Or am I incorrect in that assumption? I'm curious, not saying you're wrong to think so. : )
What standard male and female roles are you talking about?
The unicorn analogy is the same kind of analogy that if gay people can get married so can a dog and a person. Its irrelevant and in case of the god and person very insulting and vile. Truly believing you are a unicorn is psychosis, where as believing you are a certain gender is not. I think the more and more people that explore gender the less we'll all care about it in general, letting people be what they are without giving them any kind of role.
Its not about confusion either. Its about exploring and choosing for yourself. Being allowed to be what you want to be.
Politically correct? How is treating someone with basic respect and dignity the same as, what I'm assuming here, special treatment?
|
I value the opinion of science, we are creating confusion by diluting the definition of gender. If to many options are introduced, ever, it causes confusion. If a large portion of those options are make believe, as are the 11 gender options available now, then we will force confusion in an attempt to not offend someone who technically needs treatment for the psycological issue causing the confusion. We as a society are pandering to the very few at the risk of causing more damage.